Article 43

 

Thursday, July 01, 2021

NWO - Dollars and DNA

image caronavirust

The coronavirus outbreak has exposed the United States’ dangerous dependence on China for pharmaceutical and medical supplies, including an estimated 97 percent of all antibiotics and 80 percent of the active pharmaceutical ingredients needed to produce drugs in the United States.
- Coronavirus Outbreak Exposes Chinas Monopoly on U.S. Drug, Medical Supplies

In a court case in 2013 PATHOLOGY V MYRIAD GENETICS INC, in the United States the Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it was a “product of nature.” But at the end of the ruling the Supreme Court did rule that if you were to change a humans genome by mRNA vaccines (which are being used currently) then the genome can be patented.

This means that everyone who has had the vaccine is now technically patented and something that is patented is ‘owned’ and will come under the definition of ‘trans human’.

Those people that are legally identified as ‘trans human’ do not have access to Human Rights or any rights provided by the State. This is because they are not classed as 100% organic or human.

Therefore, technically anyone having this vaccine could no longer have any access to human rights.  There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so clarification should be available on this soon.

4) mRNA is CRISPR technology (moderna have described it as their “operating system") and are looking for technology to reverse the side effects, like you would do with a computer.

There is a patent at the moment LINKED to this technology:

WO2020060606 - CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA

The technology is to be placed in your body, you are then barcoded and attached to cryptocurrency.  The technology tracks your body activity and when you reach a satisfactory amount of ‘activity’ you will get paid your cryptocurrency. This is the brief version of the patent but you need to look into it properly.
- The UK Freedom Alliance

Bill Gates Chooses Corporate Patent Rights Over Human Lives

By Luke Savage
Jacobin
April, 2021

The global battle over drug company patents for COVID-19 vaccines is the latest skirmish in the irrepressible conflict between property rights and human rights. Its no surprise that Bill Gates, the monopolist billionaire, has taken the side of patents.

It’s hard to imagine a single event that could make the case for international cooperation more forcefully than a global pandemic. An infectious virus, by definition, has no regard for national politics or borders and, even with the total shutdown of all travel, is bound to threaten people in every country, disrupting daily life and commerce in the process. Virtually everyone - regardless of country, wealth, or occupation therefore has an immediate interest in reaching global herd immunity as quickly as possible. The sole exception, however, also happens to be the very industry currently at the center of vaccine production: namely, the various for-profit pharma giants that have become household names as untold millions anxiously await their jabs across every continent.

If a global pandemic makes an irrefutable case for cooperation between all nations, classes, and demographics, it also underscores the irreconcilable conflict between the needs of the many and the profits of a small few. Drug companies, after all, would stand to lose billions if their formulae were shared and supply increased, which is the main reason theyגre currently resisting efforts to amend the world’s STRICT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGIME so that vaccine production and distribution can expand. Notwithstanding this greed, COVID-19 has been an unprecedented PR coup for pharmaceutical giants, whose apologists have issued a PREDICTABLE SMOKE-SCREEN OF SELF-INTERESTED bad arguments to justify patent hoarding.

Chief among them has been billionaire Bill Gates who last weekend used an appearance on Britain’s Sky News to explain why the various recipes for vaccines currently held by drug companies should not, in fact, be shared so that production and distribution can increase. Asked directly by Sk’ys Sophy Ridge if he thought changing patent restrictions “would be helpful,” Gates answered with a quick and curt “no,” before continuing:

“Well, there’s only so many vaccine factories in the world, and people are very serious about the safety of vaccines. And so moving something that had never been done - moving a vaccine from, say, a [Johnson & Johnson] factory into a factory in India itגs novel. Its only because of our grants and our expertise that can happen at all. The thing that’s holding things back in this case is not intellectual property. Theres not like some idle vaccine factory, with regulatory approval, that makes magically safe vaccines. You know, you’ve got to do the trials on these things, and every manufacturing process has to be looked at in a very careful way.”

This is, quite simply, untrue.

Arguably more than any other single figure, the billionaire has mobilized his immense personal wealth and power to ensure that the interests of for-profit drug companies prevail over global public health.

As the Guardian’s Stephen Buranyi recently reported, plenty of manufacturing capacity currently stands ready to produce vaccines if given the necessary authorization. A single, relatively small Canadian company, as Buranyi discovered, says it’s capable of producing twenty million vaccine doses for people in the Global South but has been rebuffed by both AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. “If we had started this last year, we could have shipped millions of doses by now,” the company’s vice president John Fulton told the Guardian. “This is supposed to be like a wartime effort, everyone in it together. But that doesn’t seem to be the case.” Fulton is right, and his Ontario-based Biolyse represents only one manufacturer AMONG many equipped with the capacity to produce vaccines if patent restrictions were to be lifted.

He’s also right that the rhetoric of solidarity so ubiquitous at the pandemic’s outset has been largely hot air. Though untold public investment played a KEY ROLE in the development of vaccines, shareholders in private pharma companies HAVE RAKED IN HUGE FORTUNES while rollout has overwhelmingly benefited the RICHEST 16 PERCENT of the global population many poorer nations not expected to achieve effective vaccination levels FOR ANOTHER TWO YEARS, the most significant reason being inadequate supply.

Gates, who incidentally owes much of his own fortune to monopolistic intellectual property laws, has been more than a passive actor in the pandemic - having, among other things, CONVINCED Oxford University to renege on its original promise of a no-patent vaccine and PARTNER with the profit-driven AstraZeneca instead. ARGUABLY more than any other SINGLE FIGURE, the billionaire has mobilized his immense personal wealth and power to ensure that the interests of for-profit drug companies prevail over global public health.

As is already quite clear, it’s a recipe for vaccine apartheid and preventable death: one that will ensure people in richer countries get vaccinated more quickly and supply remains far short of what it otherwise could be. Humanity may be at war with a deadly virus, but one of the chief antagonists in the conflict is the profit mechanism at the heart of global capitalism itself. If that mechanism ultimately triumphs over humanitarian common sense, the pandemic will last longer, countless people will suffer needlessly, and we’ll have monopolist ideologues like Bill Gates to thank.

SOURCE

---

Why Big Pharma Wants Human Vaccine Factories

By Julie Beal
Activist Post
June 29, 2021

Not all coronavirus vaccines use mRNA or DNA. Some of them contain ready-made spike proteins that are made using synthetic biology. They’re grotesquely unnatural and laced with weird ADJUVANTS that most people have never heard of. The way the artificial proteins are made reveals the short cuts being taken with the mRNA/DNA versions and why calling them vaccines is the equivalent to saying a home-brew kit is the same as a glass of wine.

Bringing the DNA to life

To make a protein vaccine you need a bunch of cells and a bioreactor to put them in. DNA is injected into the cells and activated with a spark of electric, in a process known as electroporation. The cells are kept alive by feeding them so they replicate or grow, and at the same time they pump out the proteins that were encoded into the DNA. VALNEVA is producing a CARONAVIRUS VACCINE using cells that came from THE KIDNEY OF AN AFRICAN GREEN MONKEY, whilst others are using insect cells. Other proteins are grown in yeast cells, and there’s a flu vaccine grown in cells from the larvae of a moth. The DNA from any of these cells can end up in the vaccine.

How to Make a Protein Vaccine

Customize the genetic sequence of the protein using a bioinformatics computer program such as DNASTAR.

Create DNA versions of the virus protein. (This often involves using RT-PCR to amplify the required sequences, then using E. coli and a bacteriophage to transcribe them.)

Combine the DNA with a different kind of virus to create a hybrid.

Use this hybrid virus to infect a cell line in a bioreactor (basically a big metal vat).

Feed the cells with a special broth, e.g. salts, vitamins, sugars, amino acids and serum from a baby cow.

After a few days, harvest and purify the proteins, mix them with adjuvants and other ingredients, then wang them all together and call it a vaccine.

Using people as vaccine-factories

Genetic vaccines containing DNA or mRNA miss out the last few steps of this production process. Instead of using cells in a bioreactor to manufacture proteins, they use the cells of the human body. This means the substance being injected only becomes vaccine-like once the host has done the work and produced whichever protein its encoded with. It saves manufacturers a huge amount of time and money by turning people into walking-talking vaccine-factories that do the job for them. The production of the vaccine only occurs if the body translates the genetic sequences, so there’s no way to know what dose anybody’s getting, because some people may translate more of the sequences and therefore make more proteins!

A lot of synthetic vaccines have had bad press (e.g. Pandemrix in the 2009 fake pandemic) but Big Pharma has plenty more planned because it’s a versatile and patentable platform. The HEROIN VACCINE is a good example of this; it contains tetanus proteins attached to heroin molecules to make people produce anti-heroin antibodies!

And how long would it take for flu vaccines to be added to the vax ID passport?

Flublok a synthetic flu vaccine

Flublok has been licensed for use IN THE UK and the US. It contains hemagglutinin (HA) proteins from four different influenza viruses (e.g. 2009 SWINE FLU virus). The HAs of all four strains are encoded into a genetically engineered insect virus (called baculovirus) and used to infect a cell-line generated from THE OVARIES OF THE FALL ARMYWORM (it’s related to MOTHS, CATERPILLARS AND BUTTERFLIES). This infected mass of cells is fermented in a big metal vat or bioreactor, and kept alive by feeding it a CHEMICALLY-DEFINED broth. When enough HA proteins have been produced by the cells, they’re extracted with TRITION X-100 (which may have POTENTIAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING PROPERTIES).  It also contains Tween20 and HAS NOT BEEN EVALUATED FOR CARCINOGENIC OR MUTAGENIC POTENTIAL.

Genetic Contaminants

Protein vaccines are often tainted with contaminants, such as DNA from the cells they were grown in, and these are usually listed in the package insert. For instance, Flublok may contain some proteins or DNA from the insect cells or baculovirus it was grown in. Another example is the two vaccines for rotavirus that were found to contain DNA FROM A PIG VIRUS. Theres also a risk of microbes such as mycoplasma getting into vaccines; this happened in 2015 when a group of 94 people were injected with a GENETIC HIV VACCINE contaminated with a type of bacteria normally found in pigs.

Weird Adjuvants

Synthetic protein vaccines are thought to be ineffective unless they contain adjuvants. All sorts of weird stuff has been invented over the last ten years or so, using chemical and genetic engineering to create substances that can force the body to have a particular type of immune response. For example, nanoparticles can make people produce inflammatory cytokines by activating THE INFLAMMASOME. Protein vaccines often contain lipid nanoparticles, such as MPLA, saponin, cholesterol and squalene. Many also contain aluminium, and some contain CpG ODNs and other weird stuff like cholera toxins.

MPLA:

LIPID A IS THE TOXIC PRINCIPLE of lipopolysaccharide of gram negative bacteria, which causes a spectrum of changes in blood cells and vascular cells… human platelets are directly stimulated by endotoxic lipid A” MONOPHOSPHORYL LIPID A (MPLA) is a small part of Lipid A thats been derived from Salmonella bacteria and is said to be CHEMICALLY DETOXTIFIED. It’s been used in several vaccines, including CERVARIX and Mosquirix.

Developed by GSK, THE WHO, AND THE GATES FOUNDATION, Mosquirix contains malaria proteins fused with Hepatitis B proteins and is produced in yeast cells. It also contains a GSK adjuvant called AS01E, which combines MPLA with a saponin called QS-21 and is given to babies aged 6 weeks to 17 months. Mosquirix was rolled out in parts of Africa in 2019 even though THE OVERALL MORTALITY RATE for girls receiving the vaccine had almost doubled. The ingredients and EXCIPIENTS listed in the PACKET INSERT read like a recipe for chemical soup, and include a lipid called DOPC and a type of detergent called POLYSORBATE 80.

CpG ODNs:

The Valneva vaccine mentioned above contains aluminium and CpG-1018. This genetic adjuvant is a CpG ODN (oligonucleotide) which is a very short genetic sequence, or molecular pattern, associated with certain types of virus and bacteria. CpG ODNs play a trick on the body because they make the immune system react as if they were real bacteria. Theyre made from a cytosine molecule paired with a guanine molecule, forming a little couplet that would normally be connected to a backbone made of phosphate. When CpG ODNs are created as adjuvants, however, theyҒre tweaked on the nano-level in a highly unnatural way. Molecules in the backbone are tweaked so the phosphate backbone becomes a phosphorothioate backbone which is not at all normal but apparently they make the CpGs more stable so vax makers do it anyway. Phosphorothioate is also used in mRNA constructs and may be in the Moderna and Pfizer jabs.

CpG ODNs:

The Valneva vaccine mentioned above contains aluminium and CpG-1018. This genetic adjuvant is a CpG ODN (oligonucleotide) which is a very short genetic sequence, or molecular pattern, associated with certain types of virus and bacteria. CpG ODNs play a trick on the body because they make the immune system react as if they were real bacteria. Theyre made from a cytosine molecule paired with a guanine molecule, forming a little couplet that would normally be connected to a backbone made of phosphate. When CpG ODNs are created as adjuvants, however, theyҒre tweaked on the nano-level in a highly unnatural way. Molecules in the backbone are tweaked so the phosphate backbone becomes a phosphorothioate backbone which is not at all normal but apparently they make the CpGs more stable so vax makers do it anyway. Phosphorothioate is also used in mRNA constructs and may be in the Moderna and Pfizer jabs.

A company called Dynavax[ii] makes CpG-1018 and add it to their Hepatitis vaccine despite the fact that its been linked to heart attacks. Previous research has also shown that CpG-based adjuvants “could potentially trigger autoimmune disease in a susceptible individual, and the 2017 FDA review of all the adverse events linked to the vax included three cases of autoimmune disease. All vaccines produced using synthetic biology are classed as ‘biologicals’ and are excluded from the usual tests to see if they’re safe. For example: The range and type of genotoxicity studies routinely conducted for pharmaceuticals are not applicable to biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and therefore are not needed.” As a result, protein vaccines usually say on the package insert that they haven’t been tested (much) to see if they affect fertility, etc. and it looks as if the mRNA and DNA jabs have been given the same authorization.

How will people’s bodies react to these unnatural genetic creations? Will the world be forced to adapt to the new genetics? When it comes to antibodies, for instance, we make ones that match the antigen were reacting against so if the proteins are attached to polyethylene glycol (PEG), we might make ANTI-LUCIFERASE ANTIBODIES. The same thing happens with unnatural genetics, as shown by research in which animals were injected with CpG ODNs with a phosphorothioate backbone, and they responded by producing PHOSPHOROTHIOATE BACKBONE-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES.

The shape of the proteins

Proteins are made of strings of amino acids, and they’re all FOLDED INTO SPECIFIC SHAPES. When proteins become mis-folded, they are less likely to create the desired type of antibodies, and this has been linked to vaccine-associated disease enhancement (VADE). A well-known example of this type of vaccine-risk is antibody dependent enhancement, or ADE, and is linked to SARS vaccines. Viruses in old-fashioned vaccines could end up mis-shapen when formalin was used to inactivate them so they didn’t look like the original virus anymore, and this was said to be one of the reasons people made the wrong kind of antibodies and got ADE after having vaccines against measles, etc. Cell-based proteins are said to have the same problem since they can also become mis-shapen or unfolded due to the way theyre produced. Proteins produced in cells can end up having A DIFFERENT THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE than the protein in its normal context, resulting in the production of antibodies that may not recognize the infectious organism.

IT IS IMPORTANT to express proteins of disease agents with the greatest possible similarity to the authentic molecule so that the proper immune response is induced when the proteins are used as a vaccine.

Lots of things can cause a protein to get warped or denatured, such as changes in pH or temperature. Even the stuff they add as adjuvants can warp the proteins, e.g. ALUMINUM can cause them to UNFOLD whilst lipid emulsions can INDUCE STRUCTURAL CHANGES.  This is one of the reasons why there have been attempts to stabilize the proteins added to vaccines, as illustrated by Novavax.

The Novavax protein vaccine

Novavax was awarded $1.6 BILLION through “Operation Warp Speed” to make their NVX-CoV2373 coronavirus protein vaccine using baculoviruses and insect cells, so its very similar to the Valneva and Sanofi/GSK vaccines which are also made with baculoviruses and insect cells. Novavax had plenty of practice with the spike protein before the ronascam began, because they;d already developed a MERS-CoV vax and had even tested it on humans. This vaccine was described in a 2013 PATENT and contains their proprietary adjuvant, Matrix-M. This adjuvant is a mixture of saponin, cholesterol, and phospholipid nanoparticles, and its being added to their coronavirus vaccine.

The patent also covers SARS coronaviruses and describes using, “protein engineering and recombinant DNA technology to improve or alter the characteristics of the proteins.” The resulting product can be used in one of two ways: either injected directly into humans as a vaccine, or injected into humanized cows or horses so they produce SIDE AFFECTS including fatigue, loose stools, and sore throat.

The Novavax Corona-Makeover

Novavax is now using the NIHs pre-fusion design to make the spike protein. (AstraZeneca isnҒt, but J&J, Moderna and Pfizer are!) The pre-fusion design involves changing (or mutating) two amino acids to proline and is usually referred to as S-2P. Proline is used to lock the spike into position by making it more rigid and less likely to unfold but these ultra-stable spikes could cause even more damage to the body than the original virus because theyre also extra-spikey! On top of that, they can easily spread around the body because theyҒre really small and protected by lipid nanoparticles. The current coronavirus vaccines have been shown to reach the brain, ovaries and testis; this could cause inflammation in these very sensitive areas and may explain some of the neurological and menstrual problems people have been reporting.

Novavax have created some extra mutations in the spike by changing the amino acids that constitute the furin cleavage site, which consists of four amino acids. Novavax have mutated it FROM RRAR TO QQAQ (R=Arginine; A=Alanine; Q=Glutamine). Its worth knowing about these kinds of mutations because they were a key part of the gain-of-function (GoF) research funded by the NIH and outsourced to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The SARS-CoV-2 virus appears to be a man-made construct and could have been enabled by the insights gained during this GoF research. Future articles will look at these issues in more detail, such as the furin cleavage site which nobody can explain.

The unusual appearance of a furin cleavage site was a boon for the NIH because they;d spent the previous decade experimenting with the structure of coronaviruses in the Argonne National Laboratory, and had come up with the S-2P pre-fusion design in 2014. The development of a coronavirus vaccine was complemented by the GoF research, e.g. using the bat coronaviruses to patent a coronavirus vaccine!

The NIH was also doing secretive work with Moderna that involved using MERS and other viruses that also have a furin cleavage site this includes most of the so-called outbreaks that have occurred over the past two decades! All of this research resulted in the creation of the NIH’s ronascam solutions-package that was ready-to-go by 2020…

SOURCE

---

Bill Gates, Vaccinations, Microchips, And Patent 060606

By Leonid Savin
Oriental View
April 29, 2020

There are many conspiracy theories some believe that reptilians are running the US government and others believe that Coca-Cola uses the blood of Christian babies to produce its soft drinks. There are people who have seen ֓chemtrails and others who advocate wearing tinfoil hats when watching television to protect from destructive brainwashing waves. Often, the prophecies of Scripture are interpreted as a commentary on some technological discovery or event. But there are also rational facts that it doesnԒt make sense to deny because they are documented. These include the existence of the Bilderberg club, the CIAs MK-Ultra project, and George SorosҒ funding of dubious political activities in a number of countries.

The case described below relates to an officially documented fact, although there is something rather biblical about it. Patent WO/2020/060606 was registered on 26 March 2020. The patent application was filed by Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC, headed by Bill Gates, back on 20 June 2019, and, on 22 April 2020, THE PATENT WAS GRANTED INTERNATIONAL STATUS. The title of the patent is Cryptocurrency system using body activity data.”

So, what is this invention that the people at Microsoft decided to patent? The abstract of the patent application online STATES: “Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.”

n other words, a chip will be inserted into the body that monitors a persons daily physical activity in return for cryptocurrency. If conditions are met, then the person receives certain bonuses that can be spent on something.

A detailed DESCRIPTION of the “invention” provides 28 concepts for how the device could be used.

It also provides a list of countries for which the invention is intended. Essentially, this is all the members of the United Nations and a few regional organisations specified separately - the European Patent Office, the Eurasian Patent Organization, and two African intellectual property protection organisations.

Although inserting microchips into the body is nothing new - the MASONIC YOUTH CHILD IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM has been in operation in the US for a while, and people calling themselves CYBORGS exhibit various implants - Microsoft’s involvement is interesting. And why has the patent been given the code number 060606? Is it a coincidence or the deliberate choice of what is referred to in the Book of Revelation as the number of the beast?

Bill Gates name is CONSTANTLY BEING MENTIONED these days in connection with his interests in pharmaceutical companies, vaccinations, and WHO funding. Although the globalist media try to highlight Bill Gates as a great philanthropist and protect him from attacks and criticism in every way possible, it is unlikely they’ll be able to conceal a whole web of connections.

Bill Gates company is involved in another project - the digital ID project ID2020 Alliance. On the websites homepage, it says that the project has been addressing the issue of digital rights since 2016. In 2018, the Alliance worked with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Besides Microsoft, the Alliance includes the Rockefeller Foundation, the design studio IDEO.org (with offices in San Francisco and New York), the consulting firm Accenture, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance - a company that actively promotes and distributes various vaccines around the world. The Secretariat for the Alliance is based in New York.

It is telling that Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance mostly covers countries in Africa and Asia. In Europe, the organisation is only active in Albania, Croatia, Moldova and Ukraine, and, in the Caucasus, in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance also has links with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank Group, the World Health Organization, and UNICEF. These are all listed as founding partners!

Since February 2020, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has been focusing on the coronavirus pandemic. The organisations CEO is Dr Seth Berkley. Although the headquarters of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance are in Geneva, Berkley himself, an epidemiologist by training, is from New York. Since the late 1980s, he has spent eight years working at the Rockefeller Foundation and is a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He is also an advisory council member of the New York-based ACUMEN Fund.

So, yet another link has been found. Theological interpretations of the patent number are probably best left to experts on religion, but it is clear that there are strong links between organisations and companies like the Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, the pharmaceutical lobby and the World Bank Group, not to mention secondary service providers. They are trying to play the role of a supranational government by constantly focusing on the fact that, these days, national governments cannot cope with epidemics, illnesses, famines, etc. single-handed. But, as China has shown, they can. The West cannot and does not want to acknowledge this, however, largely because it does not want to share power. So, the globalist media will continue their information campaigns, where the blame will be placed anywhere but on the West. It is telling that right now, as additional information on the coronavirus has started to emerge, false stories on Chinas role in the epidemic have been stepped up and statistics MANIPULATED.

SOURCE

---

Supreme Court Rejects Human-Gene Patents—Sort Of

By Daniel Fisher
Forbes
June 13, 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court today declared human genes off-limits for PATENT PROTECTION, drawing a line between “naturally occurring” DNA sequences and similar genes entirely created in the lab.

The court’s unanimous decision in ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY VS. MYRIAD GENETICS will cheer researchers and other critics who said it was bad policy to allow a private company to obtain a patent on the BRCA genes implicated in breast cancer.

By making a distinction between “natural” DNA and a lab-created synthetic version called complementary DNA, however, Justice Clarence Thomas may have seized on a distinction that will be difficult to maintain over the long run.

“It’s one of these situations where candidly, it just makes me sad there isn’t a higher level of basic biology knowledge in the world,” said Brenda Jarrell, a Ph.D biochemist and partner with at Choate, Hall & Stewart in Boston. “Unfortunately, this is the Supreme Court.”

The decision overturns years of policy at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in favor of gene patents and could endanger thousands of such patents already granted. But that threat may be overstated, said attorney William Gaede with McDermott Will & Emery. The Patent Office has been less inclined to issue gene patents in recent years, especially since researchers have sequenced the entire human genome.

“Most of those claims are old, and many of these patents have expired,” he said.

The case involved BRCA genes that Myriad identified and isolated in order to make a test to identify women at risk for breast cancer. (Actress ANGELINA JOLIE recently revealed she HAD HER BREASTS REMOVED after testing positive for the genes.) Myriad argued the patents were justified in light of the years of work its researchers put into identifying the genes, each containing a few thousand nucleotides, on chromosomes containing tens of millions of nucleotides each.

Thomas, in his opinion, seized upon the fact that Myriad’s patents covered sequences of proteins exactly analogous to ones found in nature. The patent covers any genes that contain strands as small as 15 nucleotides long identified as belonging to the BRCA gene. That could grant the company an effective monopoly over BRCA genes even if they contained significant mutations of interest to researchers, he said.

The decision comes down to what one commentator has said should be the guiding question for patent examiners: “What did you do with your hands?” In identifying specific gene sequences, Myriad didn’t actually create anything, Thomas said.

“The location and order of the nucleotides existed in nature before Myriad found them,” he wrote. “Groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant discovery,” doesn’t satisfy the requirement that inventors invent something, he said.

He also rejected the idea that by isolating the gene and separating it from the surrounding chromosome, Myriad had created something new. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit approved approved Myriad’s “natural” BRCA genes, with one judge saying they were patentable because the act of isolating them cleaved chemical bonds linking them to the rest of the chromosome.

Thomas rejected that argument, saying it wasn’t enough to overcome the rule against patents on naturally occurring things. The Federal Circuit is a specialized court for patent appeals, but the Supreme Court has overruled it in several significant cases recently where it felt judges there had been too accomodating to patent owners.

The high court agreed with the Federal Circuit that cDNA is patentable, which was also the stance of the U.S. government. The reasoning is cDNA requires actual work in the laboratory and inverts the normal process found in nature. The synthetic DNA is an edited version of a gene, stripped of non-coding regions. The court said that makes cDNA “not naturally occurring.”

Critics say even the edited sequences are directly analogous to naturally occurring DNA. “That may be so,” Thomas wrote, “but the lab technician unquestionably creates something new when cDNA is made.”

Jarrell, who has a doctorate in biochemistry from the University of California in addition to a Harvard Law degree, said Thomas is wrong. Not only do researchers make cDNA with naturally occurring tools, but the exact same process can occur naturally in the body.

“It’s not actually correct to say cDNA is not a product of nature,” she said. “There’s nothing more inventive about making cDNA than isolating DNA.”

The DNA/cDNA distinction also could provide grist for future litigation, since cDNA is a gene sequence consisting only of exons, or nucleotides that code for amino acids.

“What if you took that same cDNA sequence and added non-functional introns?” asked DALILA ARGAEZ WENDLANDT, a partner with Ropes & Gray. Would that allow for a successful end-run around the patent?

Thomas was careful to state what the decision is not about. It doesn’t concern method patents covering novel new ways to isolate genes. Nor does it concern novel ways of applying genes for treatments. He even held out hope for inventors who alter the order of naturally occurring DNA sequences.

“We merely hold that genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible ...simply because they have been isolated from the surrounding genetic material,” he said.

Justice Antonin Scalia gave the faintest hint of concern in a concurrence, where he said he agreed with the judgment but couldn’t sign off on the heavily technical parts of the opinion. “I am unable to affirm those details on my own knowledge or even my own belief,” he said, although he agreed with the distinction between sequences taken exactly from nature and cDNA synthetically created in the lab.

Jarrell, who represents biotechnology companies, said she worries the decision will introduce more uncertainty into the patent system as examiners try to determine what they are blocked from considering for a patent and what might still be eligible. “It is a valuable discovery to figure out what gene sequences make you susceptible to breast cancer and which ones don’t,” she said, but patents based merely on those sequences are probably now barred.

The decision appears to allow a diagnostic method in which researchers attach a radioactive probe to a specific gene, but perhaps opponents could argue the gene sequence that makes the test useful is barred under this decision.

Gaede said biotech companies want to patent gene sequences because simply having a patent on a method offers less protection. Rivals can manufacture products according to the method overseas, where U.S. patent law doesn’t reach, he said, whereas owners could block those products from coming into the country if they also have a patent on the sequence. He also noted an ironic side effect of today’s decision. Some companies are working on human antibodies that are purified of the proteins left over from mouse antibodies that are their frequent source. But the closer the antibody comes to the pure human sequence, he said, the more likely it is to run afoul of Myriad.

“You may want to have something that is as close to nature as possible,” he said, but drug companies will have to consider whether that makes it harder for them to recover their investment.

SOURCE

---

What is CRISPR

New Scientist

CRISPR is a technology that can be used to edit genes and, as such, will likely change the world.

The essence of CRISPR is simple: its a way of finding a specific bit of DNA inside a cell. After that, the next step in CRISPR gene editing is usually to alter that piece of DNA. However, CRISPR has also been adapted to do other things too, such as turning genes on or off without altering their sequence.

There were ways to edit the genomes of some plants and animals before the CRISPR method was unveiled in 2012 but it took years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. CRISPR has made it cheap and easy.

CRISPR is already widely used for scientific research, and in the not too distant future many of the plants and animals in our farms, gardens or homes may have been altered with CRISPR. In fact, some people already are eating CRISPRed food.

CRISPR technology also has the potential to transform medicine, enabling us to not only treat but also prevent many diseases. We may even decide to use it to change the genomes of our children. An attempt to do this in China has been condemned as premature and unethical, but some think it could benefit children in the future.

CRISPR is being used for all kinds of other purposes too, from fingerprinting cells and logging what happens inside them to directing evolution and creating gene drives.

The key to CRISPR is the many flavours of ғCas proteins found in bacteria, where they help defend against viruses. The Cas9 protein is the most widely used by scientists. This protein can easily be programmed to find and bind to almost any desired target sequence, simply by giving it a piece of RNA to guide it in its search.

When the CRISPR Cas9 protein is added to a cell along with a piece of guide RNA, the Cas9 protein hooks up with the guide RNA and then moves along the strands of DNA until it finds and binds to a 20-DNA-letter long sequence that matches part of the guide RNA sequence. ThatԒs impressive, given that the DNA packed into each of our cells has six billion letters and is two metres long.

What happens next can vary. The standard Cas9 protein cuts the DNA at the target. When the cut is repaired, mutations are introduced that usually disable a gene. This is by far the most common use of CRISPR. Its called genome editing Җ or gene editing but usually the results are not as precise as that term implies.

CRISPR can also be used to make precise changes such as replacing faulty genes ֖ true genome editing but this is far more difficult.

Customised Cas proteins have been created that do not cut DNA or alter it in any way, but merely turn genes on or off: CRISPRa and CRISPRi respectively. Yet others, called base editors, change one letter of the DNA code to another.

So why do we call it CRISPR? Cas proteins are used by bacteria to destroy viral DNA. They add bits of viral DNA to their own genome to guide the Cas proteins, and the odd patterns of these bits of DNA are what gave CRISPR its name: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Michael Le Page

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 07/01/21 •
Section Revelations • Section NWO
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

Thursday, June 24, 2021

NWO - Whose Buying All the Houses?

image: home equity

A new company called Pacaso that was buying houses in the area. The company was co-founded by a Napa resident, and it converts houses into LLCs. Pacaso then sells shares of these corporate houses to multiple investors.
- A Startup Is Turning Houses Into Corporations

“The transformation of thousands of single homes into corporate rentals is a new business model”

Early buying by investors actually did serve a “public purpose” by soaking up vacant foreclosed homes, said Thomas Lawler, a former Fannie Mae (FNMA) economist who in 2005 warned of a housing bubble fueled by easy credit and a shift toward treating homes as investments rather than shelter. Now it’s just free-market capitalism and big money is coming in because they have an advantage. Is that good? Well, its gone from being good to being disturbing.
- Kiss Home Ownership Good-Bye, 2013

---

America’s Largest Landlord Just Got Bigger
Blackstone Buys 17,000 Houses For $6 Billion

By Tyler Durdan
Zerohedge
June 22, 2021

Wall Street won’t rest until it become the biggest - and perhaps only - landlord in the US.

At least that’s the impression one gets by observing the behavior of the two Wall Street “black” giants, Blackrock and Blackstone. As a reminder, the WSJ SPARKED WIDESPREAD OUTRAGEe recently when it exposed what most industry insiders had known for a long time, namely that Blackrock (and other institutional investors) have been ravenously gobbling up US real estate. Now it’s Blackstone’s turn.

On Tuesday, the WSJ REPORTED that Blackstone - which already is NOT ONLY AMERICA’S LARGEST LANDLORD but also the WORLD’S LARGEST REAL ESTATE COMPANY with a $325 billion portfolio - has agreed to buy single-family rental company Home Partners of America for $6 billion, betting the demand for suburban housing will stay hot even as the pandemic eases. Home Partners owns more than 17,000 houses in the United States; the company buys, rents out and eventually offers its tenants a chance to buy them. Now all those functions will be done by the largest US private equity firm.

Single-family rentals have been a favorite institutional bet over the past year, as real estate investors have sought new places to invest during a pandemic that kept Americans away from offices, hotels and malls. The result, as the WSJ reported, has been a frenzy among 200 companies and investment firms who have entered the house hunt: computer-assisted flipper Opendoor Technologies, money managers including J.P. Morgan and BlackRock, platforms such as Fundrise and Roofstock that buy and arrange for the management of rentals on behalf of individuals and builder LGI Homes Inc., which now reports wholesale home sales to bulk buyers in its quarterly results.

At the same time, remote work and school created strong demand for suburban homes by buyers and renters alike, pushing prices up and inventory down.

Clearly the tenant demand is still robust, and that’s driving significant cash flow increases at the property level, said Jeff Langbaum, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “Smart people with smart money want to get a piece of that.”

Not so smart people with dumb money also want a piece of that.

Unlike BlackRock which is a relatively recent entrant into the US housing market, Blackstone - which built Invitation Homes - into the largest single-family landlord following the U.S. foreclosure crisis, has rekindled its interest. Last August, it led a group of investors that acquired a minority stake in Toronto-based Tricon Residential Inc., which owns and operates more than 31,000 homes and apartments.

As Bloomberg notes, there may also be a case of sellers regret. The company exited its stake in Invitation Homes in 2019, selling the last of its position at $30.10 per s"hare. Blackstone made about $7 billion on its stake in Invitation, more than doubling its money, Bloomberg reported at the time. But shares in the company have increased by 25% since then.

So now it’s time for Blackstone to easily double its money again, once again courtesy of the Fed’s ultra easy money which grants the likes of Blackstone virtually unlimited funds, even as most Americans struggle to pay off their 20% APR credit cards.

The flood of investor capital comes as low inventory pushes prices higher at the fastest pace ever, and tenants opt for rental houses over apartments. Moments ago, the NAR reported that the median existing home sale price hit a record $350,000, up 24% in the past year.

image: existing home sales prices

.... while sales of houses in the $1 million price range are up 245%.

image: existing home sales price percent change

Invitation Homes posted an occupancy rate of more than 98% in the first quarter, allowing the industry giant to increase rents on new leases at a record rate.

Rising rents and low inventory have also made single-family landlords a target across the political spectrum.

Recently, book author J.D. Vance started a firestorm on Twitter by arguing that Wall Street investors were making it hard for regular Americans to buy homes… and spoiler alert: he’s right - although it’s hardly new, and is something we have been saying since 2013 when we first profiled Wall Street as America’s New Landlord (click the image to enlarge):

image: rental home infographoic

In 2019, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren blasted Blackstone for “shamelessly profiting from the U.S. foreclosure crisis,” arguing that Wall Street’s investment in single-family homes was a huge loss for America’s renters.

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 06/24/21 •
Section Revelations • Section NWO • Section Dying America • Section Next Recession, Next Depression
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

Monday, June 21, 2021

NWO - A Year Into Covid - Part 3

image: caronavirus

Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trials.
- Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies - September 2020

The paper, published on April 30, 2021, in CIRCULATION RESEARCH, also shows conclusively that COVID-19 is a vascular disease, demonstrating exactly how the SARS-CoV-2 virus damages and attacks the vascular system on a cellular level. The findings help explain COVID-19s wide variety of seemingly unconnected complications, and could open the door for new research into more effective therapies.
- Salk Researchers and Collaborators show How The Protein Damages Cells, Confirming COVID-19 As a Primarily Vascular Disease

Before focusing on the vaccine safety concerns, we call into question the true effectiveness of the vaccines and the reported estimates of effect. In the Phase I/II trial analyses, the efficiency of the mRNA vaccines were reported as 95%. The implications were derived from a Relative Risk Reduction (RRR). If the real numbers are used to determine the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), then the results are a paltry 0.8%. Had the ARR been published, then a different picture would have emerged as to the effectiveness, and why one would accept a vaccine with such low indications of benefit, and while as we are now learning, potential harms?
- The COVID-19 Spike Protein May Be a Potentially Unsafe Toxic Endothelial Pathogen

We discuss evidence that downregulated signaling pathways impinging on the mRNA translation process, engender behavioral alterations
- Linking depression, mRNA translation, and serotonin

Just as Gates installed an operating system in our computers, now the vision is to install an operating system in our bodies and use “viruses” to mandate an initial installation followed by regular updates.
- The Injection Fraud - It’s Not A Vaccine

If we can learn how to use RNA or gene delivery effectively, we may not need to make the antibodies at all.  Instead, new methods of gene delivery could enable our own cells to produce these antibodies directly.  These approaches are promising because the protection comes literally within hours after the anti-bodies are injected into the arm.
- Bill Gates, Innovation for Pandemics, NEJM May, 2018

---

Science Journals Support Claim that Pfizer Covid Vaccine May Cause Deadly Neurodegenerative Disease

By Janet Phelan
Activist Post
May 15, 2021

A recent article published in the scientific journal Microbiology and Infectious Diseases makes the claim that the mRNA Pfizer Covid vaccine may contain prions which cause deadly neurodegenerative disease, sometimes called “Creutzfeldt-Jakob” or “Mad Cow” disease. The article, titled COVID-19 RNA BASED VACCINES AND THE RISK OF PRON DISEASE was published in January of 2021 and has been studiously ignored by major media, which has focused its efforts on encouraging individuals to take the jab.

The paper was authored by J. Bart Classen, MD and analyzed the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, stating that:

The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.

The paper goes on to state that “The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.”

In other words, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine may have the capability of turning brains to mush.

Far from prompting any pause or calls for re-evaluation of the Pfizer vaccine, the media has largely ignored the paper. A few of the more notorious “fact check” websites have pronounced that the conclusions of this study are false.

ACCORDING TO USA TODAY, which appears to be possibly the only national mainstream media to have covered this article, “Contrary to Classen’s claim, there is no evidence to suggest the COVID-19 vaccines can cause prion diseases or other neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s.

USA Today cites as their source for this the fact that the FDA did not mention prion disease as an effect of the vaccine. USA Today also mentions that the CDC’s VAERS website does not mention prion disease as resulting from the Pfizer vaccine. However, as prion disease takes years to develop, it is hardly likely that the VAERS website would contain this information. The article goes on to trash the journal in which the article appeared, quoting a Dr. Angela Rassmussen with Georgetown University as stating that it is “not a reputable or reliable journal.”

The article charges that “Microbiology & Infectious Diseases is an open-access journal published by SciVision Publishers, a potential predatory publisher intended for profit rather than academic peer-review.” In fact, SciVision Publishers makes its content freely available without charge, while charging the authors a publication fee.

There are other statements intending to “slur the messenger by the fact check sites. PolitiFact stated that Classen speculates on his website that the coronavirus pandemic “is actually a bioweapon attack and may be linked to the U.S. anthrax attack of 2001.”

POLITIFACT STATES that He also included that claim - which PolitiFact has repeatedly debunked - in the body of his research article.

PolitiFact has gotten this wrong. Way, way wrong. There is a clear nexus with the attacks of September 11 and a bioweapons agenda. This nexus manifested itself in a number of ways. For one, the infamous Patriot Act, passed in the wake of 9/11, contains a little discussed section, enumerated as 817, The Expansion of the Biological Weapons Statute, which gives the US government immunity from violating its own bioweapons laws. This nexus between the events of September 2001 and a bioweapons agenda is discussed extensively in my upcoming book AT THE BREAKING POINT OF HISTORY: HOW DECADES OF US DUPLICITY ENABLED THE PANDEMIC.

Apart from the propagandistic slur above, PolitiFact also charges that Classen provides no evidence of a relationship between the Pfizer vaccine and prion disease, stating “All he includes is a three-sentence methods section summarizing an unspecified analysis of the coronavirus vaccine.”

However, in an article in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research, authors Dr. Stephanie Seneff (MIT) and Dr.  Greg Nigh discuss a variety of problems presented by the mRNA vaccines.  Their peer reviewed article, which is titled WORSE THAN THE DISEASE? REVIEWING SOME POSSIBLE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF THE MRNA VACCINES AGAINST COVID-19 also supports Dr. Classen’s concerns, stating that “When considering that the SARS CoV2 spike protein is a transmembrane protein, and that it contains five GxxxG motifs in its sequence (see uniprot.org/uniprot/P0DTC2), it becomes extremely plausible that it could behave as a prion.”

The authors go on to note Ӆthat the mRNA vaccines are designed with an altered sequence that replaces two adjacent amino acids in the fusion domain with a pair of prolines. This is done intentionally in order to force the protein to remain in its open state and make it harder for it to fuse with the membrane. This seems to us like a dangerous step towards misfolding potentially leading to prion disease.

The article also addresses concerns about vaccine “shedding,” and provides scientific validation for concerns that vaccinated can potentially infect unvaccinated with prion disease. The article states that “There has been considerable chatter on the Internet about the possibility of vaccinated people causing disease in unvaccinated people in close proximity. While this may seem hard to believe, there is a plausible process by which it could occur through the release of exosomes from dendritic cells in the spleen containing misfolded spike proteins, in complex with other prion reconformed proteins.”

In pursuit of obtaining informed scientific responses to Dr. Classens article, this reporter contacted numerous scientists working in neurology and specifically researching prions, including several cited by Classen in the footnotes to his article. No input whatsoever was received from Dr. Aaron Gitler, Dr. Oliver King, Dr. Katannya Kapeli or others contacted for their response. The FDA was also contacted for comment and did not reply.

A RECENT ARTICLE REVEALED that a neurodegenerative disease resembling “Mad Cow” disease seems to have popped up in New Brunswick, Canada, and states that “In a March 5 memo to organizations representing New BrunswickҒs doctors, nurses and pharmacists, deputy chief medical officer of health Dr. Cristin Muecke said her office is investigating a cluster of cases of ‘a progressive neurological syndrome of unknown etiology,’ or origin. The cases have many similarities to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,Ӕ she said, but testing has so far ruled out known prion diseases.

About the author:

Janet Phelan has been on the trail of the biological weapons agenda since the new millennium. Her book on the pandemic, At the Breaking Point of History: How Decades of US Duplicity Enabled the Pandemic, will be published in 2021 by Trine Day. Her articles on this issue have appeared in Activist Post, New Eastern Outlook, Infowars and elsewhere. Educated at Grinnell College, UC Berkeley and the University of Missouri Graduate School of Journalism, Janet jumped shipӔ and since 2004 has been writing exclusively for independent media. Her articles previously appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Oui Magazine, Orange Coast Magazine, the Long Beach Press Telegram, the Santa Monica Daily Press and other publications. She is the author of the groundbreaking expose, EXILE and two books of poetry. She resides abroad. You may follow Janet on Parler here [at]JanetPhelan. To support her work, please go to JanetPhelan

SOURCE

---

Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Asks One Inconvenient Question

By Taylor Penley
Western Journal
June 17, 2021

Trust the science: The phrase has echoed across the world throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, a supposed safeguard against questioning what mainstream “science” feeds us - or even injects into us.

But as controversial as it seems, basement-dwelling, tinfoil hat-wearing CONSPIRACY THEORISTS aren’t the only ones acknowledging that something could go wrong with mRNA vaccines - some of the first vaccines AUTHORIZED for distribution and COVID-19 prevention in the U.S.

This time Dr. Robert Malone - the inventor of mRNA vaccines - is considering the idea himself.

“What happens to confidence in public health and USG if ivermectin turns out to be safe and effective for COVID, and the genetic vaccines turn out to have [significant] safety issues?” he asked in a tweet on Saturday. “This looks like a very plausible scenario from where I sit.”

In a separate tweet, Malone went further.

“Regarding post-COVID genetic vaccine syndromes. I know they happen, do not know how severe or frequent, he wrote. “I argue for data transparency from @CDCGlobal @CDCgov and #QALY based risk/benefit assessment. Data. Science-based Medicine. Honesty. Transparency. Bioethics. Not conspiracy.”

Malone isn’t the only person to question just how safe mRNA VACCINES are and to argue for transparency on the issue, but, as the man who pioneered mRNA science, its safe to say his arguments pack a punch.

First, there’s the question every person should ask before being jabbed - what are mRNA vaccines?

These kinds of immunizations work differently than the traditional vaccines with which we’ve become familiar over the years.

“Instead of introducing the body to an inactivated or weakened version of a virus or a piece of it,” as previous generations of vaccines have done, “they temporarily turn the body’s cells into tiny vaccine-making factories,” Bloomberg reported.

“They do this using synthesized versions of something called messenger RNA, a molecule that normally carries genetic coding from a cells DNA to its protein-making machinery.”

The first two COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use - one from Moderna and the other from Pfizer/BioNTech - were produced by this “experimental science,” according to the report.

Since the concept is so new, however, individuals reserve the right to be wary.

After all, this technology is now INSIDE PEOPLE.

But Malone’s wariness coincides with the development of a “traditional” vaccine introduced by the U.S.-based company Novavax that’s now being labeled the “Coronavax.”

According to TRIALSITE NEWS, this traditional vaccine “demonstrated 100% protection against moderate and severe disease” and “90.4% overall efficacy,” keeping this “Coronavax” competitive with mRNA-based vaccines and superior to the Adenovirus-based Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

Malone labeled Novava’s development a “traditional” vaccine for those wary of the gene vaccines (mRNA, adenovirus vectored) in a third tweet.

Malone first developed mRNA vaccines at the Salk Institute in 1988, according to his WEBPAGE Still, 33 years later, it appears evidence of their safety is nowhere near exhaustive - especially considering this technology is now so widespread and advocated at every turn.

An EVIDENCE REVIEW from the Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-Based Practice at the University of Pennsylvania stated in December that “no large trials of any mRNA vaccine have been completed yet” and that “direct evidence on the comparative safety of mRNA vaccines and other vaccines is lacking.”

The evidence review also stated that “the only evidence on safety of mRNA vaccines comes from small phase I and phase II trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, with follow-up typically less than two months and that larger trials of the vaccine were in progress, expected to yield results in mid-2021.”

Of course, this review was published just as COVID-19 vaccines first became accessible to the public - but let’s digest that for a moment.

With so little insight into mRNA vaccines at the time their DISTRIBUTION BEGAN, shouldn’t scientists have been wary of advocating for the widespread use of this new technology so soon?

Malone seems to think so.

Even without advocating for or against the administration of mRNA COVID vaccines or any COVID vaccine, for that matter - SCIENTISTS should be open to all possibilities and should ensure that their consumers are aware of these possibilities as well.

Questions like Malone’s have led Big Tech companies to slap free-thinkers with “medical misinformation warnings” and, along with them, a threat to ban these users from their platforms altogether.

Asking questions about this new technology is obviously highly discouraged.

And we can safely assume why.

SOURCE

---

The Killer in the Bloodstream: the “Spike Protein”

By Michael Whitney
Global Research
June 17, 2021

The Spike Protein is a “uniquely dangerous” transmembrane fusion protein that is an integral part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The S protein plays a crucial role in penetrating host cells and initiating infection.” It also damages the cells in the lining of the blood vessel walls which leads to blood clots, bleeding, massive inflammation and death.

To say that the spike protein is merely “dangerous,” is a vast understatement. It is a potentially-lethal pathogen that has already killed tens of thousands of people.

So, why did the vaccine manufacturers settle on the spike protein as an antigen that would induce an immune response in the body?

Thats the million-dollar question, after all, for all practical purposes, the spike protein is a poison. We know that now due to research that was conducted at the Salk Institute. Here’s a summary of what they FOUND:

Salk researchers and collaborators show how the protein damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease… SARS-CoV-2 virus damages and attacks the vascular system (aka The circulatory system) on a cellular level scientists studying other coronaviruses have long suspected that the spike protein contributed to damaging vascular endothelial cells, but this is the first time the process has been documented.

...the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls. The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells (which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2. “If you remove the replicating capabilities of the virus, it still has a major damaging effect on the vascular cells, simply by virtue of its ability to bind to this ACE2 receptor, the S protein receptor, now famous thanks to COVID. ("COVID-19 Is a Vascular Disease: Coronavirus Spike Protein Attacks Vascular System on a Cellular Level,” scitechdaily[dot]com

Remember how everyone laughed at Trump when he said injecting household bleach would cure Covid? How is this any different?

Its not different, and whatever modest protection the vaccines provide as far as immunity, it pales in comparison to the risks they pose to personal health and survival.

And did you notice what the author said about stripping-out the virus and leaving the spike protein alone?

He said “it still has a major damaging effect” implying ‘blood clots, bleeding and severe inflammation.’ In other words, the spike protein is deadly even absent the virus. Here’s how Dr. Byram Bridle (who is a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario) SUMMED IT UP:

We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.Ŕ (Vaccine scientist: ‘We’ve made a big mistake,’ Conservative Woman)

Think about that for a minute. This is a very big deal, in fact, this is the critical piece of the puzzle that has been missing for the last 15 months. Just as the respiratory virus concealed the real killing-agent in Covid, (the spike protein) so too, the relentless hype surrounding mass-vaccination has concealed the glaring problem with the vaccines themselves, which is, they generate a substance that is “capable of causing disease.”

That is the literal definition of pathogenic. The spike protein is a disease-producing toxin that poses a serious and identifiable threat to the health of anyone who chooses to get vaccinated. Could it be any clearer? It’s worth noting, that Bridle is a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant last year for research on COVID vaccine development. He understands the science and chooses his words carefully. The term “pathogenic” is not meant to whip people into a frenzy, but to accurately describe how vaccine-generated proteins interact in the bloodstream. And the way they interact, is by inflicting serious damage to cells in the lining of the blood vessels which can result in illness or death. Here’s MORE from the same article:

“As many will know by now, the problem lies within a structure that enables the virus, originally from bats, not only to enter human cells but to deliver a toxin called the spike protein. Most Covid vaccines instruct our body cells to produce the same protein. This is in the hope that antibodies developed against it will prevent the most damaging effects of the actual virus. There is evidence that this is the case for some.

But theres also a problem, spelled out most recently by Canadian researcher Dr Byram Bridle, who was awarded a $230,000 Ontario government grant last year for research on Covid vaccine development. This is that the spike protein produced by the vaccine does not just act locally, at the site of the jab (the shoulder muscle), but gets into the bloodstream and is carried through the circulation to many other sites in the body.

Previously confidential animal studies using radioactive tracing show it to go just about everywhere, including the adrenal glands, heart, liver, kidneys, lungs, ovaries, pancreas, pituitary gland, prostate, salivary glands, intestines, spinal cord, spleen, stomach, testes, thymus, and uterus.

The quantities are small and usually disappear within days. But the questions arise, is this mechanism involved in the thousands of deaths and injuries reported soon after Covid vaccination, and might it set some people up for the same long-term consequences as in severe cases of the disease itself?” ("We’ve made a big mistake,” Conservative Woman)

This is the most important question: What will the long-term impact of these vaccines be on the population at large? Heres more from the same article:

“Some researchers say the risk from the vaccine may be greater than that from the actual virus in healthy people. This would be especially true for the young, whose immune systems deal with the virus successfully. In contrast, the vaccine has a device that protects the spike protein mechanism against immediate destruction by the body, in order to promote the immune response.

Repeat: “the vaccine has a device that protects the spike protein mechanism against immediate destruction by the body, in order to promote the immune response.”

What does that mean? Does it mean that the spike protein created by the vaccine lingers on indefinitely risking a potential flare-up sometime in the future if another virus emerges or if the immune system is compromised? Will the PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN VACCINATED have the Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads until the day they die?

Dr Judy Mikovits thinks so. Mikovits thinks the COVID-19 vaccine is a bioweapon designed to destroy your innate immunity and set you up for rapid onset of debilitating illness and premature death. She too suspects many will die rather rapidly. “It’s not going to be ‘live’ and suffer forever,” she says. “Its going to be suffer five years and die.”

Repeat:  the vaccine has a device that protects the spike protein mechanism against immediate destruction by the body, in order to promote the immune response.Ԕ

Is that possible? Could we see an unprecedented surge in fatalities in the next few years directly linked to these experimental vaccines?

Lets hope not, but without any long-term safety data, thereҒs no way to know for sure. It’s all a big guessing game, which is one of the reasons that so many people are refusing to get vaccinated. HeresMORE from Bridle:

“IҒm very much pro-vaccine, (said Dr Bridle) but… the story I’m about to tell is a bit of a scary one. This is cutting edge science. Theres a couple of key pieces of scientific information that we’ve been privy to, in the past few days, that has made the final link, so we understand now - myself and some key international collaborators - we understand exactly why these problems [with the vaccine] are happening.Ғ

One of these is that the spike protein, on its own, is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation. Indeed, if you inject the purified spike protein into the blood of research animals they get all kinds of damage to the cardiovascular system, and it can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain.

“At first glance that doesn’t seem too concerning because we’re injecting these vaccines into the shoulder muscle. The assumption, up until now, has been that these vaccines behave like all of our traditional vaccines: they don’t go anywhere other than the injection site, so they stay in our shoulder. Some of the protein will go to the local draining lymph node in order to activate the immune system.”

“However - this is where the cutting edge science has come in, and this is where it gets scary - through a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency, myself and several international collaborators have been able to get access to what’s called the biodistribution study. It’s the first time ever that scientists have been privy to seeing where the messenger RNA vaccines go after vaccination; in other words, is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is, absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting. The spike protein gets into the blood and circulates over several days post-vaccination.”

They got the biodistribution study from the Japanese? Are you kidding me? You mean, the FDA waved these experimental new technology vaccines into service before they had the slightest inkling of where the substance in the vaccine would end up in the body. If that isn’t criminal negligence, then what is? Do you want proof that our regulators are controlled by the industries they are supposed to monitor? Here it is!

Here’s MORE from an article at Childrens Health Defense on the same topic:

“ in key studies - called biodistribution studies, which are designed to test where an injected compound travels in the body, and which tissues or organs it accumulates in - Pfizer did not use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) but instead relied on a ‘surrogate’ mRNA that produced the luciferase protein”.

Regulatory documents also show Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies of its vaccine, as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP).

“The implications of these findings are that Pfizer was trying to accelerate the vaccine development timeline based on the pressures of the pandemic,” said TrialSite founder and CEO Daniel O’Connor. “The challenge is that the processes, such as Good Laboratory Practices, are of paramount importance for quality and ultimately for patient safety. If such important steps are skipped, the risk-benefit analysis would need to be compelling...

Lets see if I got this right: The Covid vaccine was approved even though “Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices” and even though “key studies did not meet good laboratory practice?”

Do you still think these vaccines are safe? And, it gets worse, too. CHECK IT OUT:

“...documents obtained by scientists through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) revealed pre-clinical studies showing the active part of the vaccine (mRNA-lipid nanoparticles) - which produce the spike protein - did not stay at the injection site and surrounding lymphoid tissue as scientists originally theorized, but spread widely throughout the body and accumulated in various organs, including the ovaries and spleen.

Like we said earlier, the vaccine was supposed to be “localized,” that is, remain in the area where it was injected. But that theory proved to be wrong, just like the theory that the spike protein would be a good antigen was wrong. There are literally thousands of fatalities and other injuries that attest to the wrongness of that theory, and there will be many more before this campaign is terminated. Here’s MORE:

“Research suggests this could lead to the production of spike protein in unintended places, including the brain, ovaries and spleen, which may cause the immune system to attack organs and tissues resulting in damage, and raises serious questions about genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity risks associated with the vaccine.”

So, it goes everywhere. Wherever blood flows, there too goes the spike proteins. Do young women really want these lethal proteins in their ovaries? Do you think that will improve their prospects for getting pregnant or safely delivering their babies? This is madness on a scale that is, frankly, unimaginable. Heres MORE:

“Studies indicate that the protein is able to gain access to cells in the testicles, and may disrupt male reproduction.”

Furthermore, the genetic code the virus carries contains inserts that make it “extremely plausible” that the protein could misfold into a prion (such as held responsible for mad cow disease in the 1980s), causing widespread damage to brain cells and increasing the risk of conditions including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease...”

We hope that readers are beginning to understand how risky these vaccines really are. Its literally a matter of life and death. As Bridle opines:

“We have known for a long time that the spike protein is pathogenic. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it’s in circulation. Now, we have clear-cut evidence that . . . the vaccine itself, plus the protein, gets into blood circulation.”

“Once that happens, the spike protein can combine with receptors on blood platelets and with cells that line our blood vessels. This is why, paradoxically, it can cause both blood clotting and bleeding And of course the heart is involved, as part of the cardiovascular system, Bridle said. ‘That’s why were seeing heart problems.’ The protein can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause neurological damage...”

“In short, we made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now. We didn’t realize that by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”

“Mistake?” He calls it a “mistake?” That’s got to be the understatement of the century!

Lets cut to the chase: These aren’t vaccines; they’re a spike-protein delivery-system. Regrettably, 140 million Americans have already been injected with them which means we can expect a dramatic uptick in debilitating medical conditions including blood clotting, bleeding, autoimmune disease, thrombosis in the brain, stroke and heart attack. The vast human wreckage we are now facing is incalculable.

Has there ever been a greater threat to humanity than the Covid vaccine?

About the author:

Michael Whitney, renowned geopolitical and social analyst based in Washington State. He initiated his career as an independent citizen-journalist in 2002 with a commitment to honest journalism, social justice and World peace.

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization

SOURCE

---

Fauci lied, millions died: The conspiracy behind hydroxychloroquine’s suppression

By Ethan Huff
Natural News
June 6, 2021

Another EMAIL BOMBSHELL from the Anthony Fauci archives has been dropped, this one showing that America’s doctor knew full well that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was an effective remedy against the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), and yet chose to lie to the public by claiming otherwise.

Not only that, but Fauci colluded with other deep state entities to ban HCQ from even being allowed as an approvedœ treatment for the Chinese Virus, even though numerous studies prove it to be an effective remedy against all sorts of coronaviruses.

Fifteen years ago, Fauci himself was a STRONG PROPONENT OF HCQ, having indicated before it was politically incorrect to do so that HCQ works against SARS, a cousin of the Wuhan Flu.

Chloroquine, Fauci admitted back in 2005, “completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” For whatever reason, the story changed in 2020 when SARS-CoV-2 (covid) emerged when Fauci suddenly decided that HCQ and its derivatives could not be used in the treatment of Chinese Disease.

In response to a Feb. 24, 2020, inquiry, Fauci was dismissive about the potential benefits of HCQ in early treatment of the Wuhan Flu.

“Is there any indication / data to substantiate this claim from China (attached publication) that chloroquine / hydroxychloroquine can decrease COVID-19 infections and lung disease?” wrote Maryland pharmacologist Philip Gatti in an email to Fauci.

“There are no data in this brief report and so I have no way of evaluating their claim,” Fauci responded. “There are a lot of these types of claims going around. I would love to see their data.”

Fauci doubled down with deception by claiming that hydroxychloroquine is “dangerous”

After being presented with the data, Fauci proceeded to double down on his claim that HCQ was ineffective against the Chinese Virus, even going so far as to claim that the use of it was “dangerous.”

During an appearance on CNN last spring, Fauci warned the networks handful of viewers that using HCQ prophylactically like then-President Donald Trump had done was dangerous, despite the fact that the drug has been used for decades without issue.

It would seem as though Fauci only wanted to contradict Trump rather than inform Americans as to a safe and effective remedy for the Chinese Flu. Because Trump was for HCQ, Fauci stood against it, proving his loyalty to politics rather than medicine.

Millions of people are now dead, thanks to Faucis bad advice. Big Tech followed suit by further censoring all information about HCQ from social media, and much of the world was plunged into lockdowns, mask mandates, and business closures Ԓ all because of Faucis lies.

Keep in mind that back in 2013, Fauci promoted the use of HCQ in the treatment of MERS, another type of coronavirus similar to SARS and the Wuhan Flu. What changed since that time? Trump became president, is the simplest answer.

“When the history books are written Dr. Tony Fauci will go down as one of the greatest mass murderers of our day,” writes Jim Hoft for The Gateway Pundit.

“He funded the research on coronavirus in the U.S. Then he funded it in China after it was banned here. Then he downplayed the severity of the disease. Then he lied about a successful treatment for the dangerous man-made pathogen. Fauci is a killer. Arrest Fauci.”

One wonders where Fauci is hiding these days as the lid is blown on this whole scandal. Fauci is quickly becoming the most hated figure on the planet, even more so, perhaps, than billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates. The good news is that justice is coming for all of them eventually.

More of the latest news about the Fauci֒s emails can be found at CONSPIRACY NEWS.

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 06/21/21 •
Section Revelations • Section NWO
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

NWO - California Covering Pandemic Rent

image: housing is a human right

California to pay off all Past Due Rent Accrued During COVID, Giving Renters Clean Slate

By Julia Marnin
Newsweek
June 21, 2021

California is paying off residents’ past due rent that was accrued during the COVID-19 pandemic, giving renters a clean slate, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced recently.

The state’s $5.2 billion in funds from Congressionally-approved aid packages is enough to pay off overdue rent, according to Newsom’s senior counselor on housing and homelessness, Jason Elliott, the Associated Press reported. However, just $32 million out of $490 million in requests for rental assistance through May 31 have been covered so far, according to a California Department Housing and Community Development report.

“We should do our best to get back to the starting point where we were in December of 2019. Anything other than that is taking advantage of a crisis,” said Keith Becker, a property manager in Sonoma County. He revealed that 14 tenants have not paid $100,000 worth of rent.

Newsom says California will pay off all past-due rent accumulated in the nation’s most populated state because of the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic, promising to make landlords whole.

Left unsettled is whether California will continue to ban evictions for unpaid rent beyond June 30, a pandemic-related order that was meant to be temporary but is proving difficult to undo.

FEDERAL EVICTION PROTECTIONS also are set to expire on JUNE 30. California had passed its own protections that applied to more people than the federal protections.

Newsom and state legislative leaders are meeting privately regarding the protections, part of the negotiations over the state’s roughly $260 billion operating budget. An extension of the eviction ban seems likely to give California more time to spend all the money to cover unpaid rent. But landlords and tenants’ rights groups are arguing over how long that extension should last.

“The expectation for people to be up and at ‘em and ready to pay rent on July 1 is wholeheartedly unfair,” said Kelli Lloyd, a 43-year-old single mother who says she has not worked consistently since the pandemic began in March 2020.

Lloyd a member of the advocacy group Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment ח is supposed to pay $1,924 a month for a two-bedroom, two-bathroom rent-controlled apartment in the Crenshaw district of south Los Angeles. But she says she’s $30,000 behind after not working for most of the last year to care for her two children as daycare centers closed and schools halted in-person learning.

That debt will likely be covered by the government. But Lloyd said she recently lost a job at a real estate brokerage and hasn’t found another one yet. She’s worried she could be evicted if the protections expire.

Simply because the state has opened back up doesn’t mean people have access to their jobs,” she said.

Becker says the overdue rent payments put financial pressure on the owners, who he says have “resigned themselves to it.”

But they have grown weary of the seemingly endless protections, which he noted were aimed at addressing a public health emergency and not meant to be permanent.

The state has been slow to distribute the $5.2 billion, and it’s unlikely it can spend it all by June 30. The California Department Housing and Community Development report doesn’t include the 12 cities and 10 counties that run their own rental assistance programs.

“It’s challenging to set up a new, big program overnight,” said Assemblyman David Chiu, a Democrat from San Francisco and chair of the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee. “It has been challenging to educate millions of struggling tenants and landlords on what the law is.”

Landlords point to the state’s rapid economic recovery as a reason not to extend the eviction moratorium much longer. California has added 495,000 new jobs since February. In April alone, California accounted for 38% of all new jobs in the U.S. This week, Newsom lifted all restrictions on businesses, heralding it as the state’s grand reopening.

“We’re getting back to normal,” Carlton said. “It’s time to go back to work. It’s time to pay the rent.”

While employment among middle- and high-wage jobs has exceeded pre-pandemic levels, employment rates for people earning less than $27,000 a year are down more than 38 percent since January 2020, according to Opportunity Insights, an economic tracker based at Harvard University.

“The stock market may be fine, we may be technically reopened, but people in low-wage jobs which are disproportionately people of color - are not back yet,” said Madeline Howard, senior attorney for the Western Center on Law and Poverty.

Some housing advocates are asking the state to keep the eviction ban in place until the unemployment rate among low-wage workers has dropped to pre-pandemic levels. It’s similar to how state officials would impose restrictions on businesses in counties where COVID-19 infection rates were higher while those with lower infection rates could reopen more quickly.

Advocates say they were encouraged when Newsom told Univision earlier this month that he “definitively” wants to extend the eviction protections beyond June 30.

“We’re cautiously optimistic,” said Francisco Duenas, executive director of Housing Now California. “We definitely need these protections as part of our recovery.”

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 06/21/21 •
Section Revelations • Section NWO
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

NWO - Burrito Economics

image: chipotle pay

Burrito Economics

By Robert Reich
June 15, 2021

House Republicans are blaming Democrats for the rise in Chipotle burrito prices.

You heard me right. The National Republican Congressional Committee ISSUED A STATEMENT last week claiming that Chipotle’s recent decision to raise prices on their burritos and other menu products by about 4 percent was caused by Democrats.

Democrats’ socialist stimulus bill caused a labor shortage and now burrito lovers everywhere are footing the bill, according to NRCC spokesperson Mike Berg.

Republicans have finally found an issue to run on in the 2022 midterm elections. Apparently, Dr. Seuss and Mr. Potato Head weren’t getting enough traction.

The Republicans tortured logic is that the unemployment benefits in the American Survival Act have caused workers to stay home rather than seek employment, resulting in labor shortages that have forced employers like Chipotle to increase wages, which has required them to raise their prices.

Hence, Chipotle’s more expensive burrito.

This isn’t just loony economics. It’s dangerously loony economics because it might be believed, leading to all sorts to stupid public policies.

Start with the notion that $300 per week in FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS is keeping Americans from working.

Since fewer than 30 percent of jobless workers qualify for state unemployment benefits, the claim is that legions of workers have CHOSEN TO BECOME COUCH POTATOES and collect $15,000 a year rather than get a job.

I challenge one Republican lawmaker to live on $15,000 a year.

In fact, evidence suggests that workers are holding back from reentering the job market because they dont have childcare or are still concerned about their health during the pandemic.

Besides, if employers want additional workers, they can do what they necessarily do for anything they want more of but canҒt obtain at its current price pay more.

It֒s called capitalism. Republicans should bone up on it.

When Chipotle wanted to attract more workers, it raised its average wage to $15 an hour. That comes to around $30,000 a year per worker still too little to live on but double the federal unemployment benefit.

Oh, and there֒s no reason to suppose this wage hike forced Chipotle to raise the prices of its burritos. The company had other options.

Chipotle’s executives are among the best paid in America. Its CEO, Brian Niccol, raked in $38 million last year - which happens to be 2,898 times more than the typical Chipotle employee earned. All of Chipotles top executives got whopping pay increases.

So it would have been possible for Chipotle to avoid raising its burrito prices by - dare I say?  paying its executives less. But Chipotle decided otherwise.

By the way, I keep hearing Republican lawmakers say the GOP is the “party of the working class.” If that’s so, the Republican Party ought to celebrate when hourly workers get a raise instead of howling about it.

Everyone ought to celebrate when those at the bottom get higher wages.

The typical American worker hasn’t had a real raise in four decades. Income inequality is out of control. Wealth inequality is into the stratosphere (where Jeff Bezos is heading, apparently).

If wages at the bottom rise because employers need to pay more to get the workers they need, that’s not a problem. It’s a victory.

Instead of complaining about a so-called LABOR SHORTAGE, Republicans ought to be complaining about the shortage of jobs paying a living wage.

But don’t hold your breath, or your guacamole.

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 06/21/21 •
Section Revelations • Section NWO • Section Dying America • Section Workplace
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home
Page 3 of 671 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »

Statistics

Total page hits 10791491
Page rendered in 4.0761 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3353
Total Comments: 338
Most Recent Entry: 09/10/2021 12:39 pm
Most Recent Comment on: 02/13/2021 10:19 am
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 13
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 172 on 12/25/2019 07:40 am


Email Us

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

Teaching should be such that what is offered is perceived as a valuable gift and not as a hard duty. - Albert Einstein.

Search


Advanced Search

Sections

Calendar

September 2021
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS and FRED Pages

Favorites

All Posts

Archives

RSS


Creative Commons License


Support Bloggers' Rights