Article 43

 

Saturday, September 04, 2004

Welcome

Welcome to article43.com - a memorial to the layed off workers of (PRE SBC MERGER) AT&T, and the disappearing MIDDLE CLASS citizens of America.  It is NOT endorsed or affiliated with AT&T or the CWA in any way.

In addition to INFORMATION, resources and opinion for former AT&T workers DEALING WITH the EFFECTS OF LAYOFF and looking for meaningful employment, some articles here are meant to bring into awareness the LARGER PICTURE of corporate dominance of the UNITED STATES’ political and economic policies which brazenly DISREGARDS, disrespects and EXPLOITS worker, citizen and HUMAN RIGHTS under masks like FREE TRADE and the PATRIOT ACT - resulting in a return to a society of very rich and very poor dominated by a few very rich and powerful - whose voices are anything but - for the people. If left UNCHALLENGED, the self-serving interests of those in control may result in the end of DEMOCRACY, the end of the middle class, irreversible ENVIRONMENTAL damage to the planet, and widespread global poverty brought on by exploitation and supression of the voices of common people EVERYWHERE, while the United States turns into a REINCARNATION of the ROMAN EMPIRE.  Author Thom Hartmann shares some history and outlines some basic steps to return our country to “The People” in his two articles TEN STEPS TO RETURN TO DEMOCRACY and SAVING THE MIDDLE CLASS. I support CERNIG’S idea for a new POLITICAL MOVEMENT - if not a revolution to cleanse our country of the filth ruling it - as we EVOLVE into a GLOBAL community - assuming we learn the THE LESSONS OF OUR TIME and don’t DESTROY CIVILIZATION first.

Everything here can be viewed anonymously.  Inserting or commenting on articles requires a free user account (for former AT&T employees with a real, non throw-away, email address.) Requests to the new user registration page are redirected to BLOGGED DOT COM’S site due to the fact that all new signups I get lately are from COMMENT SPAMMERS and their ilk, so if you really want to contribute here, contact me some other way.

There’s no third-party scripts here like privacy-eroding WEB COUNTERS, hidden datamining widgets like Pay-Pal donation boxes, or AMAZON DOT COM tracking stuff.  The RSS feeds are pulled by the server, and have no relation to anything you may be doing here.  Standard Apache WEB LOGS of info like IP, and pages visited are rotated every few days, and used internally to check the web server’s performance.  Logs of suspicious activity may be shared with law enforcement, or other ISPs, to deal with troublemakers.  Nothing here is for sale, and donations are not solicited.

Per U.S.C. COPYRIGHT LAW - TITLE 17, SECTION 107, this not-for-profit site may reproduce copyrighted material not specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such articles will either have a web link to the source, home page, and/or show credit to the author.  If yours is here and you have a problem with that, send me an EMAIL, and I’ll take it off. Stuff I wrote carries a CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE permitting non-commercial sharing. In addition, this site’s owner forbids insertion and injecting data of any kind - especially advertisements - into ours by any person or entity.  Should you see a commercial ad that looks like it’s from here, please report it by sending me a tcpdump and/or screenshot in an EMAIL, then READ UP about how the PARTNERING OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS and companies like NEBUAD are DESTROYING INTERNET PRIVACY

Resumes of layed off AT&T workers are posted for free HERE.

Information on the Pension Class Action Lawsuit against AT&T is HERE.  More pension-related articles are HERE.

Links to some Telecom companies’ career pages are HERE.

Click HERE to learn a little about Article 43 and why I loathe the CWA.
Click HERE or HERE to learn what the CWA did when given a chance to do the right thing.
Click HERE for a glimpse of undemocratic and hypocritical CWA practices.
Click HERE for an article on Corporate Unionism.
Click HERE for an article of AFL-CIO’s undemocratic history.

If you’re looking for telco nostalgia, you won’t find it here.  Check out THE CENTRAL OFFICE, BELL SYSTEM MEMORIAL, MUSEUM OF COMMUNICATIONS, TELEPHONE TRIBUTE, and THE READING WORKS websites instead.

This site can disappear anytime if I run out of money to pay for luxuries like health care or internet service.

Discernment of truth is left to the reader - whose encouraged to seek as much information as possible, from as many different sources as possible - and pass them through his/her own filters - before considering how much truth is contained here, or elsewhere.

...the Devil is just one man with a plan, but evil, true evil, is a collaboration of men…
- Fox Mulder, X Files

Today my country, your country and the Earth face a corporate holocaust against human and Earthly rights. I call their efforts a holocaust because when giant corporations wield human rights backed by constitutions and the law (and therefore enforced by police, the courts, and armed forces) and sanctioned by cultural norms, the rights of people, other species and the Earth are annihilated.
- Richard L. Grossman

Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.
- Albert Einstein

He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.
- Aquinas

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.
- Bishop Desmond Tutu

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.
- Martin Luther King Jr

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

If we do not hang together, we will surely hang separately.
- Benjamin Franklin

We must be prepared to make heroic sacrifices for the cause of peace that we make ungrudgingly for the cause of war.
- Albert Einstein

Solidarity has always been key to political and economic advance by working families, and it is key to mastering the politics of globalization.
- Thomas Palley

Update 8/11/07 - As we head into the next depression, fueled by selfish corporate greed, and a corrupt, SOCIOPATHIC US government, MIKE WHITNEY has a solution that makes a lot of sense to me:

The impending credit crisis cant be avoided, but it could be mitigated by taking radical steps to soften the blow. Emergency changes to the federal tax code could put more money in the hands of maxed-out consumers and keep the economy sputtering along while efforts are made to curtail the ruinous trade deficit. We should eliminate the Social Security tax for any couple making under $60, 000 per year and restore the 1953 tax-brackets for Americans highest earners so that the upper 1%-- who have benefited the most from the years of prosperity---will be required to pay 93% of all earnings above the first $1 million income. At the same time, corporate profits should be taxed at a flat 35%, while capital gains should be locked in at 35%. No loopholes. No exceptions.

Congress should initiate a program of incentives for reopening American factories and provide generous subsidies to rebuild US manufacturing. The emphasis should be on reestablishing a competitive market for US exports while developing the new technologies which will address the imminent problems of environmental degradation, global warming, peak oil, overpopulation, resource scarcity, disease and food production. Off-shoring of American jobs should be penalized by tariffs levied against the offending industries.

The oil and natural gas industries should be nationalized with the profits earmarked for vocational training, free college tuition, universal health care and improvements to then nations infrastructure.

READ MORE...
Posted by Admin on 09/04/04 •

Printable viewLink to this article
Home

Monday, September 06, 2010

Labor Day Blues 2010

will-work-for-food.jpg

On Labor Day, jobs crisis persists

By Andrea Orr
Economic Policy Institute
September 3, 2010

Monday September 6 will mark the third straight Labor Day that the country has been mired in an unemployment crisis. This year, the Labor Department kicked off the long holiday weekend with a new report that wasnt as bleak as expected: the private sector added 67,000 jobs during the month of August.  In fact, while the country was still losing jobs a year ago, it has added jobs to the payroll for the past eight months.

But for the typical worker, this is not cause to celebrate. Far too many Americans cannot find work: The nationwide unemployment rate remains just short of double digits. The August 2010 unemployment rate of 9.6% is barely changed from the 9.7% rate this time one year ago, and it actually rose from 9.5% in July.

This persistently high unemployment rate even as job growth slowly resumes speaks to the depth of the jobs hole resulting from the Great Recession and the tepid nature of the recovery. The United States needs to create about 100,000 new jobs each month just to keep up with population growth, and many more than that to see unemployment rates fall substantially. While RECOVERY ACT INVESTMENTS SUCCEEDED in slowing the pace of job loss and moving the job market in the right direction, job creation is now moving at a pace that EPI Economist Heidi Shierholz recently described as “excruciatingly slow.”

And its not just America’s 14.9 million unemployed and 26.1 million underemployed workers who are feeling the pain. For decades, wage growth has been falling far short of gains in productivity and in recent years the gap has widened, making it difficult even for working Americans to prosper. Earlier this week, EPI published the paper Recession Hits Workers Paychecks, showing that wages are growing at half the rate at which they expanded in the period before the start of the recession in late 2007.

This latest trend of slower wage growth compounds a longstanding problem of workers failing to enjoy the fruits of their labors. Even during the last business expansion, which ran from 2002 until the start of the recession in late 2007, productivity grew but hourly compensation fell for both high school and college-educated workers. In fact, this EPI report shows that workers - including those with college degrees earned less in 2009 than they did in 2000, when adjusted for inflation.

Trends of persistently high unemployment and slow wage growth stand in contrast to other segments of the economy such as corporate profits. Over the summer EPI President Lawrence Mishel compared the change in corporate profits since the start of the recession to the change in the labor market. He found that corporate profits had fully recovered while the labor market remained weak. By the first quarter of 2010, corporate profits were 5.7% higher than in the final quarter of 2007, but the total number of jobs had declined by 5.9% over the same period.

While the official unemployment rate is often used to sum up the health of the labor market, unemployment today would be higher were it not for a large number of workers who have either dropped out of the workforce or not entered it during the recession. Shierholz notes that although unemployment has fallen from its recent peak of 10.1% last October, that does not mean that a larger share of the population is working, but rather reflects the fact that 3.5 million workers are missing from the labor force.

Other troubling signs this Labor Day include the large number of long-term unemployed. Forty-two percent of unemployed workers have been seeking work for more than six months; 21.9% for more than a year. And several segments of the working population are seeing staggering rates of unemployment that make the nationwide rate look mild. The unemployment rate is 16.3% for black workers, 12% for Hispanic workers, and 13.8% for those with less than a high school degree. The share of youth age 16 to 24 who are neither employed nor enrolled in school is 17.9%.

And while Labor Day often calls to mind the sort of well-paying jobs in manufacturing and construction that were once the backbone of the nation’s economy, the United States has lost close to 15% of its manufacturing jobs and more than 25% of all construction jobs since the start of the recession. By contrast, many of the fastest-growing occupations today pay close to minimum wage.

For more detailed data on unemployment by demographic breakdown, consult EPIs new Labor Day Fact Sheet as well as our EconomyTrack Web site.

SOURCE

Posted by Stevie on 09/06/10 •
Section Dying America
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

Sunday, September 05, 2010

Article 43 Turns Six

I wrote my FIRST ARTICLE on September 4, 2004.

Like this time LAST YEAR - there’s NOT MUCH GOOD TO WRITE ABOUT

The middle-class is still dying, jobs are still going overseas, while mergers and aquisitions make the big guys bigger, and controllers of our destinies.

The mysterious author over at George Washington’s Blog WRITES ABOUT the eroding middle class and ills that plague this country with clarity…

---

The Government Has Encouraged the Offshoring of American Jobs for More Than 50 Years

President EISENHOWER re-wrote the tax laws so that they would favor investment abroad. President Kennedy RALLIED AGAINST tax provisions that “consistently favor United States private investment abroad compared with investment in our own economy”, but nothing has changed under either Democratic or Republican administrations.

For the last 50-plus years, the TAX BENEFITS to American companies making things abroad has encouraged jobs to move out of the U.S.

The Government Has Encouraged Mergers

The government has actively ENCOURAGED mergers, which destroy jobs.

For example, the Treasury Department encouraged banks to use the bailout money to buy their competitors, and PUSHED THROUGH AN AMENDMENT TO THE TAX LAWS which rewards mergers in the banking industry.

This is nothing new.

Citigroup’s former chief executive says that when Citigroup was formed in 1998 out of the merger of banking and insurance giants, Alan Greenspan TOLD him, I have nothing against size. It doesn’t bother me at all.

And the government has ACTIVELY ENCOURAGED the big banks to grow into mega-banks.

The Government Has Let Unemployment Rise in an Attempt to Fight Inflation

As I NOTEDlast year:

The Federal Reserve is mandated by law to maximize employment. The relevant statute states:

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

***

The Fed could have stemmed the unemployment crisis by demanding that banks lend more as a condition to the various government assistance programs, but Mr. Bernanke FAILED TO DO SO.

Ryan Grim ARGUES that the Fed might have broken the law by letting unemployment rise in order to keep inflation low:

The Fed is mandated by law to maximize employment, but focuses on inflation—and “expected inflation”—at the expense of job creation. At its most recent meeting, board members bluntly stated that they feared banks might increase lending, which they worried could lead to inflation.

Board members expressed concern “that banks might seek to reduce appreciably their excess reserves as the economy improves by purchasing securities or by easing credit standards and expanding their lending substantially. Such a development, if not offset by Federal Reserve actions, could give additional impetus to spending and, potentially, to actual and expected inflation.” That summary was spotted by Naked Capitalism and is included in a summary of the minutes of the most recent meeting…

Suffering high unemployment in order to keep inflation low cuts against the Fed’s legal mandate. Or, to put it more bluntly, it may be illegal.

In fact, the unemployment situation is GETTING WORSE, and many leading economists say that - under Mr. Bernanke’s leadership - America is suffering a permanent destruction of jobs.

For example, JPMorgan Chase’s Chief Economist Bruce Kasman TOLD Bloomberg:

[We’ve had a] permanent destruction of hundreds of thousands of jobs in industries from housing to finance.

The chief economists for Wells Fargo Securities, John Silvia, SAYS:

Companies really have diminished their willingness to hire labor for any production level,Ӕ Silvia said. ItӒs really a strategic change, where companies will be keeping fewer employees for any particular level of sales, in good times and bad, he said.

And former Merrill Lynch chief economist David Rosenberg WRITES:

The number of people not on temporary layoff surged 220,000 in August and the level continues to reach new highs, now at 8.1 million. This accounts for 53.9% of the unemployed - again a record high and this is a proxy for permanent job loss, in other words, these jobs are not coming back. Against that backdrop, the number of people who have been looking for a job for at least six months with no success rose a further half-percent in August, to stand at 5 million - the long-term unemployed now represent a record 33% of the total pool of joblessness.

And see THIS.

In fact, the Fed INTENTIONALLY curbed lending by banks in an attempt to stem inflation, without addressing whether PUBLIC BANKS could provide credit.

The Government Has Allowed Wealth to be Concentrated in Fewer and Fewer Hands

As I POINTED OUT a year ago:

A new report by University of California, Berkeley economics professor Emmanuel Saez concludes that income inequality in the United States is at an all-time high, surpassing even levels seen during the Great Depression.

The report shows that:

* Income inequality is worse than it has been since at least 1917

* “The top 1 percent incomes captured half of the overall economic growth over the period 1993-2007”

* “In the economic expansion of 2002-2007, the top 1 percent captured two thirds of income growth.”

As others have pointed out, the average wage of Americans, adjusting for inflation, is lower than it was in the 1970s. The minimum wage, adjusting for inflation, is lower than it was in the 1950s. See this. On the other hand, billionaires have never had it better.

As I wrote in September:

The economy is like a poker game . . . it is human nature to want to get all of the chips, but - if one person does get all of the chips - the game ends.

In other words, the game of capitalism only continues as long as everyone has some money to play with. If the government and corporations take everyone’s money, the game ends.

The fed and Treasury are not giving more chips to those who need them: the American consumer. Instead, they are giving chips to the 800-pound gorillas at the poker table, such as Wall Street investment banks. Indeed, a good chunk of the money used by surviving mammoth players to buy the failing behemoths actually comes from the Fed…
This is not a question of big government versus small government, or republican versus democrat. It is not even a question of Keynes versus Friedman (two influential, competing economic thinkers).

It is a question of focusing any government funding which is made to the majority of poker players - instead of the titans of finance - so that the game can continue. If the hundreds of billions or trillions spent on bailouts had instead been given to ease the burden of consumers, we would have already recovered from the financial crisis.

I noted in April:

FDRs Fed chairman Marriner S. Eccles explained:

As in a poker game where the chips were concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, the other fellows could stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit ran out, the game stopped.

***

When most people lose their poker chips - and the game is set up so that only those with the most chips get more - free market capitalism is destroyed, as the “too big to fails” crowd out everyone else.
And the economy as a whole is destroyed. Remember, consumer spending accounts for the lion’s share of economic activity. If most consumers are out of chips, the economy slumps.

And unemployment soars.

As former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich wrote yesterday:

Where have all the economic gains gone? Mostly to the top.

***

ItҒs no coincidence that the last time income was this concentrated was in 1928. I do not mean to suggest that such astonishing consolidations of income at the top directly cause sharp economic declines. The connection is more subtle.

The rich spend a much smaller proportion of their incomes than the rest of us. So when they get a disproportionate share of total income, the economy is robbed of the demand it needs to keep growing and creating jobs.

Whats more, the rich donҒt necessarily invest their earnings and savings in the American economy; they send them anywhere around the globe where theyll summon the highest returns җ sometimes thats here, but often itҒs the Cayman Islands, China or elsewhere. The rich also put their money into assets most likely to attract other big investors (commodities, stocks, dot-coms or real estate), which can become wildly inflated as a result.

***

THE Great Depression and its aftermath demonstrate that there is only one way back to full recovery: through more widely shared prosperity.

***

And as Americas middle class shared more of the economyҒs gains, it was able to buy more of the goods and services the economy could provide. The result: rapid growth and more jobs. By contrast, little has been done since 2008 to widen the circle of prosperity.

So through it’s policies encouraging the offshoring of jobs, mergers, decreasing of economic activity to fight inflation, allowing wealth to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, and other policy mistakes (like pretending that there is a “jobless recovery"), the government has channeled water away from U.S. jobs, creating a worsening unemployment drought.

Note for Keynesians: As I have repeatedly explained, the government hasn’t spent money on the right kind of things to stimulate employment. See this and this.

Note for followers of Austrian economic theory: I have repeatedly railed against the government artificially propping up asset prices and leverage, so that malinvestments can’t be cleared, and we have a stagnant, zombie economy which prevents job creation.

Posted by Stevie on 09/05/10 •
Section General Reading
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

Big Men, Little Shoes

ceo.jpg

“In this article Vivek Wadhwa laments that short shrift is paid to management training these days at many high-tech firms. You can’t be born with the skills needed to plan projects, adhere to EEOC guidelines, prepare budgets and manage finances, or to know the intricacies of business and IP law, says Wadhwa. All this has to be learned. Stepping up to address the problems of ‘engineering without leadership,’ which may include morale problems, missed deadlines, customer-support disasters, and high turnover, are programs like UC Berkeley’s ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP PROGRAM and Duke’s MASTERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, which aim to teach product management, entrepreneurial thinking, leadership, finance, team building, business management, and motivation to techies.”
- SoukSkill at ShashDot

Tech Industry Managers: Little Men in Big Shoes?

By Vivek Wadhwa
Tech Crunch
September 4, 2010

When I was ready to transition from computer programmer to project manager, my employer, Xerox Corporation, sent me to its huge training center in Leesburg, Virginia. Over two weeks, the people there taught me some of the skills I needed in order to succeed in my new role: managing projects, motivating people, complying with employment regulations, and preparing status reports and presentations. The company also encouraged me to complete an MBA, on a part-time basis, at New York University. It gave me lots of time off and paid for the tuition.

Tech companies in the internet era offer their employees some great perks. But do you think that Facebook, Groupon, or Zynga provide budding professionals with any serious management training? Not at all. Given the way tech companies grow and the HR challenges they face, management training and career development are more important than ever. But few have the timethey are too busy surviving.

Professors Robert Fulmer and Byron Hanson of Duke University’s Corporate Education group researched the management practices of 23 leading high-tech firms. Corporate executives in an overwhelming majority, 89 percent, believed that leadership development was becoming increasingly important for their companies; 58 percent ranked this as a high corporate priority. Yet less than one-fourth of the managers interviewed had a clear roadmap for how they could develop themselves, and more than half didnt even know who in their organization was responsible for the development of leaders. The conclusion of the researchers wasn’t surprising: many high-tech companies are young, so their systems and procedures for grooming leaders arent well developed or firmly established.

Maybe this is why so many tech companies suffer from morale problems, missed deadlines, customer-support disasters, and high turnover. And this may be one of the reasons why so many tech startups who succeed in selling their vision and raising millions in financing are just a flash in the pan.

One of the interesting findings in the Fulmer and Hanson research was that more than 70 percent of the tech executives interviewed said that leadership development in technology-driven firms is different than in other industries. The researchers believed, just as I do, that these tech executives were dead wrong. The lessons that leading companies like Proctor and Gamble and General Electric have learned about management development and training apply as much, if not more, to tech companies.

This means that if you’re a fresh grad joining a hot new tech startup, you shouldn’t expect your managers to train and groom you, or the company to provide you with time off to complete an MBA. You’re on your own. If you are working at some of the more established companies, such as IBM and H Pwhich do have excellent management-development practices - take full advantage of them. You need to learn all you can.

Many people are born with an innate sense of vision; they readily learn new technologies and master them. Some are very good at communicating and inspiring others. But you cant be born with the skills needed to plan projects, adhere to EEOC guidelines, and prepare budgets and manage finances, or to know the intricacies of business and intellectual property law. All this has to be learned. Some skills can be developed on the job, but this is usually through trial and error.

I usually recommend that engineering students who want to become managers and CEOs complete a fifth year of education. There are one-year long engineering management programs which cover such subjects as marketing, finance, intellectual property, business law, and management - similar to the key courses in an MBA program; plus tech-oriented subjects like innovation management, operations management, and entrepreneurship.  One such program (and there are many) is the Duke Masters of Engineering Management program, at which I teach.

For experienced tech workers in Silicon Valley, Berkeley and Stanford both have excellent executive MBA programs. Berkeley Haas School dean, Rich Lyons told me over dinner, last month, of his plans to make his school the premier training ground for Silicon Valley executives. Bostons Babson College is also launching a program in San Francisco.

But not everyone needs to spend two years doing an MBA. Berkele’s college of engineering is creating a much shorter program targeted at Silicon Valley techies with leadership potential. Under the aegis of Fung Institute Chief Scientist and Director of UC Berkeleys Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, Ikhlaq Sidhu, the school is developing a professional program in Engineering Leadership. This will meet one evening a week for six months and teach subjects like product management, entrepreneurial thinking, leadership and finance. It will also teach team building, business management, and motivation.

The new Berkeley program is highly selective however.  It will only accept 25 candidates in 2011, based on recommendations from senior executives in the valley. Sidhu says that he hopes to address the symptoms of engineering without leadership - which include organizational indecision about new products and services; unresolved conflict between product management and engineering; and superficial technology strategies.  Berkeley will likely expand this program significantly over time and add many others. After all there is a great need.

Editors note: Guest writer Vivek Wadhwa is an entrepreneur turned academic. He is a Visiting Scholar at the School of Information at UC-Berkeley, Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School and Director of Research at the Center for Entrepreneurship and Research Commercialization at Duke University. You can follow him on Twitter at @vwadhwaand find his research at http://www.wadhwa.com.

SOURCE

Posted by Stevie on 09/05/10 •
Section General Reading
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home

Saturday, September 04, 2010

No Gods Required

universe.jpg

· God created us to test us, to give us a chance to choose him or reject him.
· God made me to know, love and serve him in this world, and to be happy with him in the next.
· God’s purpose is to make the soul great.
- Stafford Betty - National Catholic Reporter

Religion is attractive for at least a three reasons:

· None of us likes to think that death is really the end.  Christianity gained real popularity among meso-Americans because their religion did not include eternal life.
· We all like to think we are special, something the Abrahamic religions are really good at.  Its all about middle eastern tribalism - our tribe is the chosen tribe.
· An attempt to explain that which can’t be explained.
- Ron Beasley - Newshoggers

The real art of spiritual being is not to transcend being human, it is to achieve understanding and harmony between all aspects of who we are.
- Annett Tate

---

In what no-doubt will be a controversial article (I’m not stating the obvious am I?)—which appears in the Life and Style section of The Wall Street Journal on September 4, 2010—Stephen W. Hawking, from the University of Cambridge, and American physicist Leonard Mlodinow, from the California Institute of Technology, co-write the article “Why God Did Not Create the Universe.”

By William Atkins
IT Wire
September 4. 2010

The EDITORIAL REVIEW by Dr. Hawking of The Grand Design on Amazon dot com states, “In The Grand Design we explain why, according to quantum theory, the cosmos does not have just a single existence, or history, but rather that every possible history of the universe exists simultaneously.”

The article is actually an excerpt from the book HAWKING and Mlodinow co-wrote called “The Grand Design,” which is set to be published by Bantam Books on September 7, 2010.

And, We question the conventional concept of reality, posing instead a “model-dependent” theory of reality. We discuss how the laws of our particular universe are extraordinarily finely tuned so as to allow for our existence, and show why quantum theory predicts the MULTIVERSE - the idea that ours is just one of many universes that appeared spontaneously out of nothing, each with different laws of nature.

So far, 390 COMMENTS appear after The Wall Street Journal article—and no doubt many more will arrive in the future.

You have your reasons to believe what you believe as to the question: How did we come to be?

Page two concludes without a conclusion.

Whatever that stance, science and religion are looking for the truths and the explanations to that question and many more. Sometimes they agree, many times they don’t.

If we had a definite answer to this question, the debate would still not be raging on between members of the scientific and religious communities. In fact, the debate occurs “within” each community as individual members disagree on such questions.

However, that answer has eluded us so far. Faith may be the cornerstone of religion, and the laws of nature the foundation of science, but, in actuality, nobody knows for sure the answer to the question: Why are we here?

We can only ponder them, question each other, and continue to investigate.

We can learn more about our world (our universe) around us, and we can continue to marvel at the new discoveries that seem to constantly arrive at our doorsteps each day.

We all could keep an open mind and search all avenues open to us in this world before us.

A wide range of comments follows the Hawking-Mlodinow article. They seem to be just as interesting as the statements made by the two scientists.

Our questions are just about as limitless as the universe (or is that universes?) ....

SOURCE

READ MORE...
Posted by Stevie on 09/04/10 •
Section Religious Diversions
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home
Page 1 of 436 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »

Statistics

Total page hits 417986
Page rendered in 4.5724 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 2179
Total Comments: 246
Most Recent Entry: 09/06/2010 02:13 pm
Most Recent Comment on: 01/10/2010 09:40 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 6
Total anonymous users: 0
Most Recent Visitor on: 09/06/2010 10:10 pm
The most visitors ever was 77 on 03/17/2008 07:28 am


Email Us

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

One of the advantages of being a bureaucrat is that you don't have to waste time and energy trying to be creative. - Anonymous

Search


Advanced Search

September 2010
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Favorite Posts

Sections

Most recent entries

Join our Mailing List

RSS Feeds

The Middle Class

The Newshoggers

Gripeline

Today's News

External Links

American Solidarity

Editor's Choice

All Posts

Archives

RSS


Creative Commons License