Article 43


Saturday, August 24, 2013

Obama And Education


Obama links college affordability to middle-class prosperity in weekly address

Bu Susan Gardner
Daily Kos
August 24, 2013

Students and families and taxpayers cannot just keep subsidizing college costs that keep going up and up. Not when the average student now graduates more than $26,000 in debt.

We cannot price the middle class out of a college education. Thats why I proposed major new reforms to make college more affordable and make it easier for folks to pay for their education.

President Barack Obama continued his past week’s pitch of selling college affordability in this morning’s weekly address, outlining reform proposals to help shore up the struggling middle class.

The three main pillars of the president’s proposed changes are:

New college ratings on “opportunity,” i.e., value and affordability for a wide range of incomes.

“Innovating” through competition, i.e., testing out new types of learning (online, “course credit for competence, not just hours spent in classroom.").

A new loan repayment program: “Pay-As-You-Earn, which caps your loan payments at 10 percent of what you make.”

“These reforms wont be popular with everybody,” the president acknowledged, perhaps thinking of the student loan industry. “But the path we’re on now is unsustainable for our students and our economy.” He closed his address with a a solid mantra worth keeping in mind as Democrats try to move forward to relieve the student debt burden:

Higher education shouldnt be a luxury, or a roll of the dice; itҒs an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.

Remarks of President Barack Obama

The White House Weekly Address
August 24, 2013

Hi, everybody. Over the past month, Ive been visiting towns across America, talking about what our country needs to do to secure a better bargain for the middle class.

This week, I met with high school and college students in New York and Pennsylvania to discuss the surest path to the middle class - some form of higher education.

But at a moment when a higher education has never been more important, its also never been more expensive. That’s why, over the past four years, weve helped make college more affordable for millions of students and families with grants and loans that go farther from before.

But students and families and taxpayers cannot just keep subsidizing college costs that keep going up and up. Not when the average student now graduates more than $26,000 in debt.

We cannot price the middle class out of a college education. That’s why I proposed major new reforms to make college more affordable and make it easier for folks to pay for their education.

First, were going to start rating colleges based on opportunity - are they helping students from all kinds of backgrounds succeed, and on outcomes their value to students and parents.  In time, we’ll use those ratings to make sure that the colleges that keep their tuition down are the ones that will see their taxpayer funding go up.

Second, were going to jumpstart competition between colleges over innovations that help more students graduate in less time, at less cost, while maintaining quality. A number of schools are already testing new approaches, like putting more courses online or basing course credit on competence, not just hours spent in the classroom.

And third, we’re going to help more students responsibly manage their debt, by making more of them eligible for a loan repayment program called Pay-As-You-Earn, which caps your loan payments at 10 percent of what you make. And well reach out directly to students to make sure they know that this program exists.

These reforms won’t be popular with everybody. But the path were on now is unsustainable for our students and our economy.

Higher education shouldn’t be a luxury, or a roll of the dice; its an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.

Thanks, and have a great weekend.



Our President Plans to “Rate” Colleges

By Jim Yardley
Patriot Dreams
August 24, 2013

When I glanced at the first story I read about President Obama’s PLANS to “rate” colleges, my first thought was “Hey, what’s he doing?  It isn’t March.  The NCAA Tournament is months away!”

As it turns out, the whole thing was just Obama being Obama.  As usual, he spoke in vague generalities.  As always, the metrics to be used in evaluating these institutions of higher learning were obviously subjective, and subject to “nudging” as needed to produce a desired (read: politically favorable) result.

Couching the idea in inevitably unclear terms, the president uses the “carrot and stick” approach to addressing the rising costs of college educations.

Lindsey M. Burke, writing in National Review Online, notes:

A big part of the president’s plan includes creating a college-rating system - a federal scorecard - to evaluate colleges on measures such as graduation rates, the number of low-income students served (i.e., the percentage of Pell Grant recipients), graduate earnings, and affordability.

So Obama’s big idea is to create a rating system.  And what exactly is this rating system supposed to rate?

Graduation rates?  There are more than a few studies that indicate that admissions tinged with affirmative action goals set up many minority students for failure when they are admitted to universities with high-pressure, high-performance expectations.  There are also factors for failing to complete a college course of study that have little or nothing to do with the quality of university, or its instructors.  Doubt that?  Bill Gates never finished college.  How would Obama’s rating system classify him?

How about the number of low-income students served?  Is the number of students receiving Pell Grants truly a good indicator?  What about students who are being partially subsidized by joining the ROTC, or are having a significant portion of their tuition covered by their employer?  Or is this provision just an extension of the NSA’s efforts to pry ever more intimately into our private lives?  If only Pell Grants are considered, might not colleges demand copies of not only a student’s Federal Income Tax returns, but their parents’ as well, just to show the Washington bureaucrats tallying up the scorecard that they really do serve low-income students?

Perhaps the suggestion of tallying up graduate earnings is the key to delivering an objective assessment of the real worth of a post-secondary school.  Of course, if a student graduates from Harvard, doesn’t that distort that metric compared to a school like Slippery Rock Teachers College, located somewhere in Smalltown, USA?  SRTC might produce the next Einstein, but will he be hired at a salary equivalent to that of a dunce whose daddy donated a building to the old Alma Mater?  Another question that would need to be defined would be at what point, post-graduation, this earnings number is to be determined.  Are we going to use the honor system, like with ObamaCare subsidies?  If graduates refuse to respond to the universities’ questionnaires, will their degrees be revoked?  Will they have to code the school from which they graduated on their annual 1040 tax form?  What if a person got a B.S. from one school, an M.S. from another, and a Ph.D. from a third, which was outside the United States, like Oxford or Cambridge?  Should those who never went to college also code the high school they attended?  That would make identifying “failing schools” a bit easier for the bureaucrats.

And what about the Department of Propaganda—I mean, Department of Education?  Will they start insisting on examining the core curriculum for “sensitivity,” “diversity,” and “political correctness”?  Will colleges, to get a good rating, be forced to require certain courses?  Could a college catalog in a very few years outline a mandatory course of study for any major that includes courses in “Gender Studies,” “Islamic History and the Impact of Islam on the U.S. Space Program,” or “The Idiotically Obvious Danger of Global Warming”?

Think that could never happen?  Well, did you ever think that kids would be taught how to put a condom on a banana in a classroom?

Claims coming from the administration that this proposal has anything to do with reducing the cost of college educations, both to the student and the government, should be seen for what they are, which is a distraction from the real goal.  Once a government can qualitatively evaluate private enterprises (which most colleges and universities are), then it begins to control those enterprises.

The only government function that has ever worked exactly as intended, and was simultaneously effective in doing so, is the military.  That has worked quite well whenever it has been assigned a task.  Of course, one must always remember what the job description of the military is, and has been over the centuries, regardless of the nation, race, or religious persuasion of that military: to kill people and break things.  (Yes, every government program ends up breaking things, but they aren’t usually designed to do that intentionally.)

This idea from our current president needs to be strangled in the crib.


Posted by Elvis on 08/24/13 •
Section General Reading
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Page 1 of 1 pages


Total page hits 9423082
Page rendered in 0.6877 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3191
Total Comments: 337
Most Recent Entry: 09/18/2019 10:14 am
Most Recent Comment on: 01/02/2016 09:13 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 11
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 114 on 10/26/2017 04:23 am

Email Us


Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

The chief lesson I have learned in a long life is that the only way you can make a man trustworthy is to trust him; and the surest way to make him untrustworthy is to distrust him and show your distrust. - Politician Henry L. Stimson


Advanced Search



August 2013
       1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS Pages


All Posts



Creative Commons License

Support Bloggers' Rights