Article 43


Friday, March 03, 2023

Democracy Hollowed Out Part 45 - Targeting Bloggers Again

image support bloggers rights

Failing to qualify for the DMCA safe harbor still leaves you with fact-based defenses from a lawsuit, including the defense, supported by some case law, that infringing third-party posts aren’t your responsibility.
- Bloggers Read This

We look at two cases before the Supreme Court that could reshape the future of the internet. Both cases focus on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which backers say has helped foster free speech online by allowing companies to host content without direct legal liability for what users post.
- The Mother of All Privacy Battled Part 24

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
- First Amendment To The United States Constitution


Florida bill would make bloggers who write about governor register with state
Rules for bloggers who write about elected officials raise First Amendment concern.

By John Brodkin
Ars Technica
March 3, 2023

A proposed law in Florida would force bloggers who writeabout Gov. Ron DeSantis and other elected officials to register with a state office and file monthly reports or face fines of $25 per day. The bill was filed in the Florida Senate Tuesday by Senator Jason Brodeur, a Republican.

If enacted, the proposed law would likely be challenged in court on grounds that it violates First Amendment protections of freedom of speech and the press. Defending his bill, Brodeur said, “Paid bloggers are lobbyists who write instead of talk. They both are professional electioneers. If lobbyists have to register and report, why shouldn’t paid bloggers?” ACCORDING TO THE FLORIDA POLITICS NEWS WEBSITE.

The BILL TEXT defines bloggers as people who writefor websites or webpages that are “frequently updated with opinion, commentary, or business content.” Websites run by newspapers or “similar publications” are excluded from the definition.

The proposed registration requirements apply to bloggers who receive payment in exchange for writing about elected state officers, including “the Governor, the Lieutenant Governor, a Cabinet officer, or any member of the Legislature.” Bloggers who writeabout a member of the legislature would have to register with the state Office of Legislative Services, while bloggers who writeabout the governor or other members of the executive branch would have to register with the Commission on Ethics.

“If a blogger posts to a blog about an elected state officer and receives, or will receive, compensation for that post, the blogger must register with the appropriate office… within 5 days after the first post by the blogger which mentions an elected state officer,” the bill said. “Upon registering with the appropriate office, a blogger must file monthly reports on the 10th day following the end of each calendar month from the time a blog post is added to the blog.”

Hard to imagine a bigger First Amendment violation

The reports would have to name the “individual or entity that compensated the blogger for the blog post” and specify the “amount of compensation received.” There would be fines “of $25 per day per report for each day late, not to exceed $2,500 per report.” The blogger requirements would use the “same procedure by which lobbyists are notified of the failure to timely file a report and the amount of the assessed fines.”

“It’s hard to imagine a proposal that would be more violative of the First Amendment,” New York-based civil rights lawyer RON KUBY said, according to an NBC NEWS ARTICLE. “We don’t register journalists. People who writecannot be forced to register.”

Scott Wilkens, senior counsel at the KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE at Columbia University, told Ars that the “bill raises serious First Amendment concerns about free speech online. It seems very hard to draw a meaningful distinction between paid bloggers who writeabout the Florida executive or legislative branches and journalists who do the same. The bill regulates speech about issues of public concernissues that lie at the heart of the First Amendment.”

We also got a statement from Bruce Brown, executive director of the REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. “When a bill this plainly unconstitutional is introduced it’s essential that journalists explain to the public why it runs afoul of the First Amendment,” Brown said. “Our system of free expression rejected the British tradition of licensing printers because we recognized that it was the essence of self-rule to have complete freedom to criticize the public officials who act in our name. The registration regime proposed here would encumber that and deny Floridians their right to hear from a variety of voices about the conduct of their elected leaders.”

DeSantis demanded new defamation law

The Florida Legislature is separately considering proposals that would make it easier for people to sue media organizations for defamation; these proposals have also been criticized for harming freedom of speech. Brodeur filed one of the defamation proposals on Monday.

The defamation proposals were spurred by DeSantis, who last month held a roundtable discussion on media defamation and CALLED ON the legislature “to protect Floridians from the life-altering ramifications that defamation from the media can cause for a person who does not have the means or the platform to defend himself.”

“We’ve seen over the last generation legacy media outlets increasingly divorce themselves from the truth and instead try to elevate preferred narratives and partisan activism over reporting the facts,” DeSantis said. “When the media attacks me, I have a platform to fight back. When they attack everyday citizens, these individuals don’t have the adequate recourses to fight back. In Florida, we want to stand up for the little guy against these massive media conglomerates.”


Posted by Elvis on 03/03/23 •
Section Dying America • Section Fascism
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Page 1 of 1 pages


Total page hits 13233772
Page rendered in 0.6131 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3645
Total Comments: 341
Most Recent Entry: 06/16/2024 08:48 am
Most Recent Comment on: 06/14/2023 06:21 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 6
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 588 on 01/11/2023 03:46 pm

Email Us


Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. So are our emotions in the the presence of great art or music or literature, or of acts of exemplary selfless courage such as those of Mohandas Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. - Carl Sagan


Advanced Search



March 2023
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most recent entries

Must Read

RSS Feeds

BBC News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Favorites

BLS and FRED Pages


Other Links

All Posts



Creative Commons License

Support Bloggers' Rights