Article 43


Privacy And Rights

Sunday, June 25, 2006

America’s Dying Privacy

The Total Information Awareness program was killed in 2003, but its spawn present bigger threats to privacy.
By Jonathan Turley
Common Dreams
June 24, 2006

The Disclosure this week of a secret databank operation tracking international financial transactions has caused renewed concerns about civil liberties in the United States. But this program is just the latest in a series of secret surveillance programs, databanks and domestic operations justified as part of the war on terror.

Disclosed individually over the course of the last year, they have become almost routine. Yet, when considered collectively, they present a far more troubling picture, and one that should be vaguely familiar.

Civil liberty-minded citizens may recall the president’s plan to create the Total Information Awareness program, a massive databank with the ability to follow citizens in real time by their check-card purchases, bank transactions, medical bills and other electronic means. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, was assigned this task, but after its work was made public, Congress put a stop to it in September 2003 as a danger to privacy and civil liberties.

However, when Congress disbanded the Total Information Awareness program, it did not prohibit further research on such databanks, or even the use of individual databanks.

And, according to a recent study by the National Journal, the Bush administration used that loophole to break the program into smaller parts, transferring some parts to the National Security Agency, classifying the work and renaming parts of it as the Research Development and Experimental Collaboration program.

It was long suspected that Total Information Awareness survived, and the disclosure this week of another massive databank operation has only reinforced that fear. The spawn of DARPA seem to be turning up in secret programs spread throughout agencies.

The administration learned that it could not create a network of databanks in one comprehensive system, but it could achieve the same results by creating smaller systems that could be easily daisy-chained at a later date into the same kind of massive computer bank that Congress thought it had shut down. It is DARPA, albeit with assembly required for the ultimate user.

Consider some of the recent disclosures:

· A domestic surveillance program operated without warrants involving thousands of calls that are isolated by computers at the NSA.

· A massive databank that contains information on hundreds of millions of telephone calls of Americans that is described as the world’s largest database.

· Access to information in a massive databank that carries 12.7 million messages each day on international financial transactions.

· Use of massive private databanks with access to an array of information on citizens, including at least 199 data-mining projects.

· Quiet support for a national registered-traveler program in which citizens voluntarily submit private information and subject themselves to background checks for faster passage through airport security. (The information would then be housed in a computer system accessible to the government.)

These computer databanks and programs are technically separate but collectively could exceed the dimensions of the DARPA program killed in 2003. Most of these systems have certain common characteristics, including the absence of congressional approval. Indeed, the recently disclosed financial transaction program was created by the Bush administration as an emergency program, but it has continued for years.

Although the administration has refused to involve the courts in such programs, it actually contracted out the role of oversight according to the New York Times, it hired a private auditing firm to make sure that the monitoring of financial transactions was not being misused. Such outsourcing of civil liberty protections is hardly what the framers foresaw when they created a system of checks and balances.

Most of these programs are designed to look for suspicious conduct from everyday transactions. By combining information, the government uses “link analysis” to find something suspicious among otherwise innocent-looking transactions. It also is a technique that necessarily exposes innocent citizens to constant forms of surveillance or monitoring ח the very danger of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program that Congress wanted to avoid.

It now appears that the administration has achieved by stealth what it could not achieve by persuasion in Congress: the creation of a computer network that could follow millions of citizens to reveal their movements and transactions.

It is all part of this administration’s insatiable desire for information. With regard to its own conduct and information, the administration has fought against the notion of transparency from refusing to disclose meetings with lobbyists, to denying Congress information needed for oversight, to threatening journalists with prosecution for revealing secret programs such as the NSA domestic surveillance program.

Yet, when it comes to citizens, the administration demands total transparency to allow it to monitor everyday transactions and conduct.

It is perhaps the greatest danger that can face a free society: a government cloaked in secrecy with total information on its citizens.

For most of our history, one of the greatest protections for civil liberties has been the practical inability of the government to surveil a large number of citizens at one time. In the last couple of decades, those technological barriers have fallen away.

In the meantime, the Supreme Court has removed legal barriers to the government’s acquisition of personal information by allowing it to obtain the records of banks, telephone companies and other businesses without a warrant. This combination of legal and technological changes has laid the foundation for a fishbowl society in which citizens can be objects of continual surveillance.

Americans have long been defined by our privacy values. We have fiercely defended what Justice Louis Brandeis called “our right to be left alone.” It is only in the assurance of privacy that free thoughts and free exercise of rights can be truly exercised. Such privacy evaporates with doubt; it is why the Constitution seeks to avoid the chilling effect of uncertainty in government searches and seizures.

Yet, the problem has been that these programs have been revealed and analyzed in isolation. Each insular program has been defended in insular terms. It is just domestic telephone numbers or just international transactions. Citizens have become accustomed to a steady stream of secret programs and new forms of government monitoring. It is something that our fiercely independent ancestors would have never imagined.

Privacy is dying in America - not with a fight but a yawn.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor at George Washington University.


Posted by Elvis on 06/25/06 •
Section Privacy And Rights
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

The Microsoft Contractor

May 22, 2006

SEATTLE - Microsoft Corp. has told about 1,000 technology contract workers to take seven days off the job, without Microsoft pay, in a cost-saving move that came as the company unveiled a series of new perks for its internal staff.

Microsoft spokesman Lou Gellos said Monday that Microsoft told vendors who supply the contractors that about 1,000 workers globally would not be needed this week. The vendors, whose workers do software development for Microsoft, also were told to schedule two other days off, Gellos said.

Gellos said this was one of the first times that Microsoft has scheduled a short period of time off for its contractors. He said the company made the decision because it was running over budget in some areas as it headed toward the end of its fiscal year on June 30.

He stressed that the contractors work was being delayed, not canceled.

We want to be fiscally responsible here,” Gellos said.

The vendors were informed of the decision at the beginning of the month. It affects workers in Redmond, India and elsewhere, he said.

Gellos also said the decision was unrelated to a move, announced late last week, to offer new perks to its Redmond employees such as enhanced child-care benefits, access to dry cleaning and grocery delivery services, and better cafeteria food.

“I can understand why people might think that there is a connection, but there is not,” Gellos said.

Along with the new perks, Microsoft said it was rejiggering its compensation and evaluation system. The moves were widely seen as efforts to improve morale and keep up with competitors such as Google Inc. who also offer enticing benefits. Microsoft executives have said that one key to battling companies such as Google effectively is being able to get Ӕ and keep talented workers.

In a memo to employees, Lisa Brummel, senior vice president of human resources, called the plan “a broad set of investments we are making to ensure that Microsoft continues as one of the worlds best places to work, with great opportunities, great leadership and a great working environment.”

Marcus Courtney, president of the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, a tech worker advocacy group, said he thinks the two moves illustrate there is an unequal system for those who work at but not for - Microsoft.

“It shows the unfair relationship that they have between Microsoft and these contractors,” he said.

In addition to its tens of thousands of internal employees, Microsoft relies heavily on contractors for all manner of tasks. The company was involved in a long-running legal battle, beginning in the early 1990s, over its use of temporary workers, but it has since changed its practices.

Bill Wilson, a software engineer who has worked as a contractor at Microsoft for about six months, said he was surprised when he found out last week that he wouldnt be working - or getting paid for seven working days beginning Monday. Wilson, 57, said he might have made different financial plans if he’d known about the time off. But he was more concerned about some of his colleagues with younger kids and lower salaries.

It’s gotta be quite a shock, he said.

Although Microsoft said it would not pay the workers, Gellos said the companies that provide the workers were free to schedule them at other jobs during that time. But Courtney said it he thought it was unlikely that workers could line up something else so quickly.

Gellos would not name the companies providing the workers.

But Plano, Texas-based EDS Corp. confirmed that it contracted fewer than 25 of the workers. Companies often ask EDS to make changes like this, and noted that such flexibility is one reason they use contract workers, spokesman Travis Jacobson said.

“To us, this is just business as usual,” he said.



Posted by Elvis on 06/06/06 •
Section Privacy And Rights • Section Microsoft And Windows
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Page 72 of 72 pages « First  <  70 71 72


Total page hits 10837242
Page rendered in 0.7059 seconds
41 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3359
Total Comments: 339
Most Recent Entry: 10/14/2021 11:24 am
Most Recent Comment on: 09/26/2021 05:03 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 3
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 172 on 12/25/2019 07:40 am

Email Us


Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

The worst solitude is to be destitute of sincere friendship. - Francis Bacon


Advanced Search



October 2021
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS and FRED Pages


All Posts



Creative Commons License

Support Bloggers' Rights