Article 43

 

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

NWO - A Year After Covid

image: coronaviris

Yet there is one area where the world isnt making much progress: pandemic preparedness. This failure should concern us all, because history has taught us there will be another deadly global pandemic.  We can’t predict when, but given the continual emergence of new pathogens, the increasing risk of a bioterror attack, and the ever-increasing connectedness of our world, there is a significant probability that a large and lethal modern-day pandemic will occur in our lifetime.

And every year, advances in science make it easier for some-body to create a biologic weapon of mass destruction.

If we can learn how to use RNA or gene delivery effectively, we may not need to make the antibodies at all.  Instead, new methods of gene delivery could enable our own cells to produce these antibodies directly.  These approaches are promising because the protection comes literally within hours after the anti-bodies are injected into the arm.
- Bill Gates, Innovation for Pandemics, NEJM May, 2018

Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trials.
- Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies - September 2020

We discuss evidence that downregulated signaling pathways impinging on the mRNA translation process, engender behavioral alterations
- Linking depression, mRNA translation, and serotonin

Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door.
- Matthew 24:33

People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken.
- Luke 21:26

The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the [Party’s] world-view and mental habits ... , but to make all other modes of thought impossible.
- George Orwell

As of now, the level of propaganda in the MAINSTREAM MEDIA (MSM) is quite high, with all of our television, printed media and internet sites associated with MSM OWNED BY ONLY 5 corporations.
- Propaganda American Style

---

Have you noticed HOW HARD IT IS TO HAVE A LIVELY AND INFORMATIVE ONLINE DIALOGUE about the experimental Coronavirus vaccines?  And God forbid if you go on one of the social media sites and ask a question that may raise doubt of its efficacy - YOU MAY FIND YOUR QUESTION DELETED:

Twitter and Facebook suppressed the Hunter Biden scandal. They controlled what we could say about COVID-19. They stomped on reports of election fraud.

Now, the social media behemoths are deciding what Americans can or cannot read about the new COVID vaccines.

If the intent is to confuse, put us in fear, and/or supress the truth - it’s working.

We’re a year into the COVID19 PANDEMIC. For me - some things are getting a little clearer, some clear as mud, and some seem almost ORWELLIAN.

AFTER LISTENING to American politicians and mouthpieces drone on with CONFLICTING BICKERING - I only believe two things today:

1. The virus is real.  Else I figure President Trump WOULDN’T HAVE LEFT an ocean liner filled with infected people off the Pacific coast when it first started:

“I don’t need the numbers to double because of one ship,” Trump said, noting the U.S. numbers currently of 11 deaths and 240 infected.

2. There’s no real effort to fight it except for an EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION being pushed on us as a lifesaver to the killer contagion.

“Operation Warp Speed” is an impressive effort supercharged with around $10 billion in federal dollars spent with big pharma

Rule number one for a virus on the loose is CONTAINMENT - find and quarantine those affected to stop its spread. A plan for that never really got off the ground here.  If it HASN’T HAPPENED YET, I doubt it ever will:

Of 2,000 people surveyed, two-thirds, or 64 percent, of people had never been tested for coronavirus.

WHATEVER TESTING we had is a joke.  Besides CONCERNS OF PCR TESTS - results took days or weeks to get back, making them USELESS:

“The simplest thing, which has to do with such insanity, is you should not reimburse somebody for getting a test that it takes more than 48 hours to get the result back. That test is a complete waste. And to all these numbers about how much we test, the majority is just complete waste,” Bill Gates said during his interview.

The government could have put the 20 million or so of us unemployed to work contact tracing to help in containment.  Did they?  No.

With all the talk about masks being of utmost importance - one would think government would mail us all a box, or maybe put vending machines in schools, supermarkets, etc - LIKE THEY DID IN HONG KONG - giving them out for free:

Vending machines providing free medical grade safety masks will be installed in service centers in 18 Hong Kong districts

‘Even though viruses can get in our bodies THROUGH OUR EYES, not much talk about eye protection.

The clear tissue that covers the white of the eye and lines the inside of the eyelid, known as the conjunctiva, can be infected by other viruses, such as adenoviruses associated with the common cold and the herpes simplex virus

Of all the news clips I’ve watched and read the past year starring Dr Fauchi - only once do I remember eye protection MENTIONED:

July 31, 2020 - In addition to wearing face masks, people should consider wearing goggles or eye shields for increased protection from COVID-19, Dr. Anthony Fauci said.

Look how fast they STARTED ACTING ON AN MRNA INJECTION:

On January 11, 2020, the Chinese authorities shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus.

On January 13, 2020, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Moderna’s infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for mRNA-1273, the Company’s vaccine against the novel coronavirus. At that time, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of NIH, disclosed their intent to run a Phase 1 study using the mRNA-1273 vaccine in response to the coronavirus threat and Moderna mobilized toward clinical manufacture. Manufacture of this batch was funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

It seems to me like we’re all guinea pigs for an injection surrounded in MAINSTREAM MEDIA information.  At the same time - trying to discuss it ON THE INTERNET, can even get doctors CENSORED:

Since June, Amazon has twice tried to suppress self-published booklets I have written about Covid-19 and the response to it. These booklets dont contain conspiracy theories. Like the scientists who wrote the Great Barrington Declaration, I simply believe many measures to control the coronavirus have been damaging, counterproductive and unsupported by science.

Evolutionary biologists Heather Heying and Bret Weinstein discuss with Bill Maher HERE.

This rest of the discussion can be downloaded below:

:image

While BIG BUSINESS GETS OFF scott free:

The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration hasn’t investigated most of the thousands of complaints employees have filed this year expressing concern about infection risks in the workplace

Workplace outbreak and worker infection information is limited because there is no comprehensive national surveillance system to collect case information by industry and occupation, other reporting is not mandatory and because testing is limited. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Systems is the only federal agency with requirements for employers to report infection information.

The only thing clear to me now - is that a new type of injection - MRNA VACCINE - is being pushed on us to combat the coronavirus - with little real effort to stop it from spreading. 

Since the new vaccines are untested, there’s just as much of a chance they won’t stop the virus’ spread as much as they will. Any day now I’m waiting to hear something on the news that ANOTHER CARONAVIRUS WAVE is on the way - WONDERING WHY the powers that be don’t seem to want to fight it any other way but an injection that raises lots of questions.

WHAT NEXT I wonder.

Imagine if the whole thing is a put on?  It wouldn’t surprise me.

VIETNAM:

In August 1964, the United States entered the Vietnam War after reports of an unprovoked attack in the Gulf of Tonkin. But the reports were false and the president knew it.

IRAQ:

A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements were part of “an orchestrated campaign that effectively GALVANIZED PUBLIC opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.”

---

The Covid Pandemic Is The Result of Public Health Authorities Blocking Effective Treatment

By Paul Craig Roberts
February 18, 2021

Why are all the countries in the world following the same unsuccessful and irresponsible response to Covid?  The masks and six feet “social distancing” are ineffective, and so are the vaccines. Unless the mask is a N95, the mask does not prevent transmission of the virus. As the virus is airborn or areosol spread, six meters between persons dies not prevent spread. The lockdowns are more damaging to people and economies than Covid.

Why are authorities enforcing ineffective measures while ignoring proven successful measures that greatly reduce the Covid threat and perhaps eliminate it altogether? Is it because the proven measures are inexpensive and offer no opportunity for large profits from vaccines?  Is it because the Covid “pandemic” is useful for mandating control measures that curtail civil liberties?  Is it because the lockdowns decimate family businesses and enable further economic concentration?  The answer is “yes” to all three questions.

The Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford Univesity, Sir John Bell, has revealed that COVID VACCINATION CAUSES MORE MUTATIONS OF THE VIRUS, requiring new vaccines in an endless chase. 

I asked a distinguished virologist if the Oxford professor was correct, and was told: “Yes, Covid vaccination does and will cause more mutations.” There already are a number of varients, and the South African government has reported that the vaccine it has purchased is not effective against the Covid strain in South Africa. 

Moreover, the vaccines themselves have not undergone long-run testing, and many serious reactions and more than 1,000 deaths are associated with the vaccinations. Some scientists are concerned that the untested technology in some of the vaccines will have adverse effects on the immune system and result in a jump in the overall death rate.  However, we look at it, we are flying at least partly blind.  Why as there is a far superior way to proceed?

First, begin with prevention.  Vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, and NAC are effective and inexpensive immune boosters that ward off infection and reduce the severity of infection. Jonathan Cook gives a report on the latest research HERE.

Then turn to cures.  Both the HCQ/zinc/antibiotic treatment and the Ivermectin/zinc/antibiotic treatment are proven, safe, and inexpensive. Yet the evidence has been kept from the public. Even the most knowledgeable experts are deplatformed when they say anything that is in conflict with the vaccination/lockdown agenda.  The media are complicit in keeping the public uninformed. Why is this?  How does information suppression help deal with an alleged world pandemic?  Clearly, it does not help.

I have reported many times on the effectiveness of HCQ/zinc.  You can use the search feature on this website to locate my reports. IVERMECTIN has proven to be even more effective than HCQ.  Dr. Marc Wathelet, a leading virologist, has brought the evidence for Ivermectin before the government of Belgium. 

There is no justifiable reason for not using these cures, and there is no justifiable reason for not initiating a prevention program based on supplements, diet, and a more healthy life style. The failure of governments and health authorities to employ these proven means amounts to premeditated mass murder.  The reason people have died from Covid is the refusal to treat and to prevent with known effective means.  Instead, governments and health authorities have interfered with doctors and prevented treatment with HCQ and Ivermectin, while using the presstitutes to brainwash the public that these effective and safe treatments are dangerous. 

The massive disinformation campaign waged against effective prevention and treatment does not come from ignorance and incompetence of public authorities.  It comes from the agendas that Covid is being used to advance, agendas whose toll in human life and suffering is unimportant to those whose agendas are being served.

What reason is there for people in any country to have confidence in their government and public health authorities?

SOURCE

---

The Covid Deception Serves An Undeclared Agenda

By Paul Craig Roberts
February 19, 2021

Dear Readers,

There is no scientific basis for the measures in place to deal with the alleged Covid Pandemic.  Among experts the support for these measures are largely limited to those with financial links with pharmaceutical corporations. Public health bureaucrats, such as Fauci at NIH, are also linked with pharmaceutical corporations.  Medical practioners take their guidance from approved authority, which means NIH, CDC, WHO, all compromised with conflicts of interest.  Conforming with these compromised institutions provides liability protection that relying on independent - expert advice does not.

One thousand five hundred experts from around the world have come together to challenge the Covid measures as a global scientific fraud of unprecedented proportions. 

HERE IS THEIR STATEMENT

Selected Highlights

Stay home, save lives - was a pure lie.

Remove the following illegal, non-scientific and non-sanitary measures : lockdown, mandatory face masks for healthy subjects, social distancing of one or two meters.

The lockdown not only killed many people but also destroyed physical and mental health, economy, education and other aspects of life.

The natural history of the virus [the coronavirus] is not influenced by social measures [lockdown, face masks, closure of restaurants, curfew]

When the state knows best and violates human rights, we are on a dangerous course.

Exclude your experts and advisers who have links or conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies :

Stop the vaccination campaigns and refuse the scam of the pseudo-health passport which is in reality a politico-commercial project

Is it safe to assume that compromised public health bureaucries with links to pharmaceutical corporations know more and are more trustworthy than independent experts?

What is the real agenda behind the Covid Deception?  Clearly it is not public health.

How was media orchestrated to deplatform and censor experts who challenge the obviously unsuccessful Covid measures?  It should make you instantly suspicious when scientifically ignorant and totally compromised presstitutes dismiss dissenting independent experts as conspiracy theorists.

Why is no public discussion of the situation possible? If the Covid measures could stand examination, there would be no censorship.

Clearly, an undeclared agenda is being shoved down our throats. 

In THIS ARTICLE Dr. Pascal Sacre explains why the PCR test results in a huge exaggeration in the number of Covid infections and thus serves the assertion of a pandemic and the creation of fear that causes people to accept tyrannical measures.

That independent scientifc experts have been forced out of public discussion should tell you how utterly corrupt are the governments of the world. 

SOURCE

---

Dangers of human mRNA genetic experiment presented as vaccine - Reiner Fuellmich and Dolores Cahill

Europa
February 22, 2021

video - mrna side effects

Reiner Fuellmich and Dolores Cahill discuss the great dangers of what in reality and legally a genetic experiment on humanity. It is, however, is presented by the manufacturers as a “vaccine against Covid-19.” Besides the danger of increased disease symptoms due to ANTIBODY DEPENDENT ENHANCEMENT (ADE), they look at the implications of applying globally and for the first time ever, an mRNA injection, that may be capable of changing human DNA.

REINER FUELLMICH is a German international lawyer, specialized in global, corporate corruption. His best known case to date is the VW DEISEL FRAUD IN 2015 which he won ( BBC ). Together with three other lawyers he started the THE INAPPROPRIATE PCR TEST which is at the base of the whole scheme. However, the dangers of the current humans trials on a global scale with the mainly untested mRNA injections are the priority now.

DELORES CAHILL a renowned immunologist from Ireland who initiated the WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE to facilitate an open platform to promote Freedom in all its forms and offer the information of experts that are activelly silenced or even censored by the corporate media.

They are just two of countless medical specialists and other professionals who oppose the current global and national politics on Covid-19, some restrictive other mandated, imposed by the WHO, national governments and to a certain extend Anthony Fauci and global pharmaceutical industry.

SOURCE - ORIGINAL FULL VIDEO

---

Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation

By Mordechai Sones
America’s Frontline Doctors
March 25, 2021

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer DR. MIKE YEADON about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population.”

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and RANIER FUELLMICH in Germany.”

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.”

“In the U.K., its abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering vaccines to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic: inbuilt in the way they work’”

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.”

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.”

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?”

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else.”

“Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.”

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune complement system), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

AFLDS: The Israel Supreme Court decision last week cancelling COVID flight restrictions said: In the future, any new restrictions on travel into or out of Israel need, in legal terms, a comprehensive, factual, data-based foundation.

In a talk you gave four months ago, you said

“The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.”

“The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; its cross immunity.”

“So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.”

In other words, previous exposure to SARS that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 - bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

“Yeadon: What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2.”

“The study is from one of the best labs in their field.”

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not “high throughput” and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K.”

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits ‘for research on scale,’ subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune.”

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus.

For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death. So how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated.

“Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die.”

Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who havent already had COVID-19?

Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case?

And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity,” would that then not protect from any super-variant?

“I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to dangerous variants. I am worried that its some kind of trick.

“As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous.

“No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.”

“It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to escape immunity.”

“Not only is it intrinsically unlikely - because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research.”

THE RESEARCH I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants.

“This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant.”

“I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE. I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural’ experiments, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines.”

“The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right).”

“The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.”

Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection?

“Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA.

“lways good quality interactions.”

“Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.

“So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest."”

“The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine.

“You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmichs “Corona Committee” online.

“So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless.”

“Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us.”

“Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots.”

“I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator.”

“I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us.”

“Please warn every person not to go near ‘top up vaccines.’ There is absolutely no need to them.”

“As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes.”

“For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world’s population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.”

“It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 02/24/21 •
Section Revelations • Section NWO • Section Dying America
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home
Page 1 of 1 pages

Statistics

Total page hits 10350555
Page rendered in 3.8112 seconds
43 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3321
Total Comments: 338
Most Recent Entry: 04/19/2021 12:17 pm
Most Recent Comment on: 02/13/2021 10:19 am
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 16
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 172 on 12/25/2019 07:40 am


Email Us

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

A wise man only speaks when he has something to say; a Fool speaks when he has to say something. - Plato

Search


Advanced Search

Sections

Calendar

April 2021
S M T W T F S
       1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS and FRED Pages

Favorites

All Posts

Archives

RSS


Creative Commons License


Support Bloggers' Rights