Article 43

 

Saturday, February 03, 2007

Bad Moon Rising Part 9 - Scientists Beg No Nukes

Scientists Plead US Not To Use Nukes
Forbid Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Non-Nuclear States

nuke.jpg

By Kim McDonald
USCD News
February 1, 2007

Twenty-two of the nation’s most prominent physicists asked Congress today to RESTRICT THE AUTHORITY of President Bush to order NUCLEAR STRIKES against non-nuclear-weapon states.

The physicists include twelve Nobel laureates, the current and three past presidents of the American Physical Society, the nation’s preeminent professional society for physicists, and the chair of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The physicists said their letter was PROMPTED BY the rising tensions with Iran and the potential for MILITARY confrontation, as well as the public statement by President Bush on April 18, 2006 , that a NUCLEAR STRIKE AGAINST IRAN is an option “on the table.”

It was initiated by Jorge Hirsch, a professor of physics at the University of California , San Diego , who last year put together a PETITION signed by more than 2,000 physicists that repudiated new U.S. nuclear weapons policies that include preemptive use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear adversaries.

The very fact that NUCLEAR WEAPON USE is not being ruled out as an OPTION - against a state that does not have nuclear weapons and does not represent a direct or imminent threat to the United States illustrates the extent to which the Bush administration has changed US NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLICY,” said Kurt Gottfried, chair of the Union of Concerned Scientists. The use of such a weapon against deeply buried targets would create massive clouds of radioactive fallout that could spread far from the site of the attack, including to other nations.”

The physicists said in their letter that they “are firmly convinced that Congress should have a say on which course of action would best serve the American people on the use of the terrible weapons our profession helped create.”

“Under present law, the President has sole authority to order the use of nuclear weapons,” said Hirsch. “We could wake up tomorrow to learn that he has ordered preemptive tactical nuclear strikes against Iran ‘s underground facilities. By not legislating on this issue, Congress is implicitly condoning and even abetting such a potential action by the Executive.”

The LETTER, points out that in the case of non-nuclear adversaries there is no extreme urgency associated with response or preemption of nuclear attack against our country or our allies.

“Leaving such a fundamental decision to the executive branch of our government alone, in the absence of imminent danger of nuclear attack, defies common sense,” added Douglas Osheroff, a physics professor at Stanford University and Nobel laureate who signed the letter.

The letter echoes the main objection of last falls physicists’ petition to the changes in U.S. nuclear weapons policies, as well as last year’s STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY expressing deep concern about the possible use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states and for pre-emptive counterproliferation purposes.

It stresses that the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty will be irreversibly damaged by the use of nuclear weapons by a nuclear nation against a non-nuclear one, with disastrous consequences for the security of the United States and the world.

Crossing the nuclear threshold, even with a low-yield weapon, would erase the 60-year old taboo against the use of nuclear weapons and make their use by others more likely,”the physicists pointed out.  There are no sharp lines between small “tactical nuclear weapons and large ones, nor between nuclear weapons targeting facilities and those targeting armies or cities.”

“Presumably, Congress would not authorize the use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon countries unless under extraordinarily exceptional circumstances,” said Andrew Sessler, a former director of Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and former president of the American Physical Society who signed the letter. “The passing of such legislation would have a very positive effect in encouraging non-nuclear countries that presently may be considering the development of nuclear weapons to not do so, as well as encouraging nuclear weapons countries with small arsenals to disarm.”

The letter concludes:  ”A decision that would have a major impact on the course of history and could ultimately threaten the survival of civilization should not be in the sole hands of the PRESIDENT unless absolutely unavoidable. We urge Congress to pass binding legislation to forbid the use of nuclear weapons by the United States against countries which do not possess nuclear weapons, except with explicit prior Congressional authorization for such action.”

The 22 physicists who coauthored the letter are: Philip Anderson, professor of physics at Princeton University and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Michael Fisher, professor of physics at the Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland and Wolf Laureate in Physics; Jerome Friedman, professor of physics at MIT and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Kurt Gottfried, emeritus professor of physics at Cornell University and Chair of the Union of Concerned Scientists; David Gross, professor of theoretical physics and director of the Kavli Institute of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara and Nobel Laureate in Physics; John Hall, NIST senior fellow at University of Colorado, Boulder and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Jorge Hirsch, professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego; Leo Kadanoff, professor of physics and mathematics at the University of Chicago and National Medal of Science recipient, Physical Sciences; Wolfgang Ketterle, professor of physics at MIT and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Daniel Kleppner, professor of physics at MIT and Wolf Laureate in Physics; Walter Kohn, emeritus professor of physics at University of California Santa Barbara and Nobel Laureate in Chemistry; Joel Lebowitz, professor of mathematics and physics at Rutgers University and Boltzmann Medalist; Anthony Leggett, professor of physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Eugen Merzbacher, emeritus professor of physics at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and former president, of the American Physical Society; Douglas Osheroff, professor of physics and applied physics at Stanford University and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Norman Ramsey, emeritus professor of physics at Harvard University and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Edwin Salpeter, emeritus professor of physics at Cornell University and Dirac Medalist; Andrew Sessler, former director of Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and former president of the American Physical Society; Jack Steinberg er, member of the European Center for Nuclear Research and Nobel Laureate in Physics; George Trilling, emeritus professor of physics at University of California, Berkeley, and former president of the American Physical Society; Steven Weinberg, professor of physics at University of Texas at Austin and Nobel Laureate in Physics; Frank Wilczek, professor of physics at MIT and Nobel Laureate in Physics.

The physicists are submitting their letter to each of the 535 members of the 110th Congress.

SOURCE

Bad Moon Rising
Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5
Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9 - Part 10
Part 11 - Part 12 - Part 13 - Part 14 - Part 15
Part 16 - Part 17 - Part 18 - Part 19 - Part 20
Part 21 - Part 22 - Part 23 - Part 24 - Part 25
Part 26 - Part 27 - Part 28 - Part 29 - Part 30
Part 31 - Part 32 - Part 33 - Part 34 - Part 35
Part 36 - Part 37 - Part 38 - Part 39 - Part 40
Part 41 - Part 42 - Part 43 - Part 44 - Part 45
Part 46 - Part 47 - Part 48 - Part 49 - Part 50
Part 51 - Part 52 - Part 53 - Part 54

Posted by Elvis on 02/03/07 •
Section Bad Moon Rising
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home
Page 1 of 1 pages

Statistics

Total page hits 9519570
Page rendered in 2.2640 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3206
Total Comments: 337
Most Recent Entry: 11/21/2019 10:21 am
Most Recent Comment on: 01/02/2016 09:13 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 8
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 114 on 10/26/2017 04:23 am


Email Us

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

The hardest thing of all to see is what is really there. - J A Baker

Search


Advanced Search

Sections

Calendar

December 2019
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS Pages

Favorites

All Posts

Archives

RSS


Creative Commons License


Support Bloggers' Rights