Article 43

 

Bad Moon Rising Part 72 - Made In China 2025

image: china flag

Beijing must prepare counterattack for Washington’s effort to restrain high-tech development

By Hu Weijia
Global Times
September 6, 2018

Washington’s trade dispute with Beijing doesn’t seem to have helped the US stave off its chronic illness of running a trade deficit - at least not yet. The US trade deficit rose to a five-month high in July as exports sank 1 percent from June to $211.08 billion.

As for China, its July exports rose 12.2 percent year-on-year despite fresh US tariffs. China’s economy seems to show more resilience than that of the US amid escalating trade friction. Why? China’s industrial competitiveness may be one reason. In the short term, US consumers can hardly find alternative products to those made in China, so the impact of US tariffs was less than expected.

In the first round of Sino-US trade friction, China’s strategy has been proved to be effective. On the one hand, China hit back against the US’ unilateral moves with tit-for-tat tariffs on a long list of US products; on the other hand, China improved its defensive posture by reinforcing its manufacturing sector, which is the backbone of the economy.

The government is working to make China’s business environment more appealing to manufacturers and looking at fiscal policies that support upgrading its manufacturing sector. China’s huge trade surplus is primarily based on mechanical and electrical products. As long as its manufacturing sector remains competitive, China’s exports won’t tumble. The country is able to handle the pressure of trade tensions if it sticks to its established strategies.

It’s possible that the trade dispute will become a long-lasting conflict. In the second round of trade tensions, China is likely to focus more on manufacturing transformation.

China’s economy is in a critical period in terms of restructuring. Amid escalating trade friction, China has no choice but to pursue a path of independent innovation and overcome the challenges it faces in manufacturing transformation. US protectionist measures won’t hurt China, but will serve as an external catalyst for China’s industrial upgrading that will make the country a manufacturing superpower.

In August, South China’s Guangdong Province released a plan aiming to realize 150 billion yuan ($21.8 billion) worth of investments annually in strategic and emerging industries during the 2018-20 period. China has to be prepared to counterattack US efforts to restrain the rise of China’s high-technology industries.

SOURCE

---

How “Made in China 2025” became the real threat in a trade war

By Jessica Meyers
LA Times
April 24, 2018

China unveiled its plan to dominate the world’s most crucial technologies with little international fanfare, another vague, guiding principle in the labyrinth of Communist Party bureaucracy.

Three years later, it’s at the core of a trade dispute with Washington that threatens to upend the global economy.

Made in China 2025 is a blueprint for transforming the country from a labor-intensive economy that makes toys and clothes into one that engineers advanced products like robots and electric cars. The Trump administration views it as an attempt to steal U.S. technology and control cutting-edge industries.

Officials aimed to temper the initiative this month when they announced potential tariffs on $50 billion in goods. But Chinese leaders consider the plan key to the country’s development and refuse to alter its course.

“China is trying to achieve a clear goal and America wants to stop it,” said Andrew Polk, co-founder of Trivium/China, a Beijing research firm. “And that’s where the competition is.”

Here’s what China 2025 is all about and what it means for the trade war:

What’s the objective?

The plan funnels billions into 10 industries, everything from biopharmaceuticals to aerospace and telecom devices. It calls for 70% of related materials and parts to be made domestically within a decade. A separate documentdetails China’s strategy to lead in artificial intelligence by 2030.

Officials modeled Made in China after a German initiative called Industrie 4.0, which envisions greater automation in manufacturing and “intelligent factories” that operate with wireless sensors. They didn’t have much choice. The world’s biggest population is aging and rising wages are sending low-tech factories to other countries.

“The labor supply is decreasing,” said Ashley Qian Wan, China economist for Bloomberg Economics in Beijing. “And that’s going to be a big problem for China.”

Why does China care about this so much?

When President Kennedy vowed in 1961 to send a man to the moon, more than 30 million people in China had just starved to death. People’s Republic founder Mao Tse-tung closed universities for a decade while researchers invented the Internet in Silicon Valley. China sees itself as simply trying to catch up.

The country developed its first bullet train last year, a 248 mph vehicle named Fuxing, or rejuvenation. Engineers also built the country’s first homegrown jetliner, an initial step toward filling Beijing’s crowded airport with planes from China rather than America’s Boeing or Europe’s Airbus.

Officials portray the initiative as transparent and open to foreign companies. They dispel notions that it will monopolize domestic markets. America’s dismissal of the plan reinforces a party narrative that the U.S. seeks to undermine China’s resurgence.

“We have good reasons to question the legality and legitimacy of many actions taken by the U.S. on the grounds of national security, like its plan to impose high tariffs on many industries of Made in China 2025,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told reporters this month. “Clearly, they are targeting something else.”

Why is the U.S. concerned about it?

The Trump administration frets about the way China aims to achieve its 2025 ambitions. American businesses have long complained about the sacrifices they make to operate in the world’s largest market, including requirements to partner with domestic companies and hand over trade secrets.

Officials fear these techniques will make it impossible for U.S. companies to compete in the world’s most critical fields. They also worry massive Chinese government subsidies will lead to a global glut of products that push down prices and hurt U.S. businesses.

“There are things China listed and said, ‘We’re going to take technology, spend several hundred billion dollars, and dominate the world,’” U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer told senators at a March hearing. “And these are things that if China dominates the world, it’s bad for America.”

A lengthy U.S. report on China’s intellectual property theft which led to the most recent potential tariffs 0 mentioned the plan more than 100 times. Officials are exploring multiple ways to restrict Chinese investment in key industries. The administration recently banned ZTE, China’s second-largest maker of telecom equipment, from buying American technology.

“Consensus is growing in Washington that the U.S. is in a race with China for technical leadership,” Arthur Kroeber, managing director of Beijing research firm Gavekal Dragonomics, said he recently told clients. And some think “economic cold war is the answer.”

Is the Trump administration right?

President Xi Jinping recently told a room full of global investors that China would further open its economy. Officials last week said they would phase out rules that require car manufacturers like General Motors to find a local partner before opening factories in China. They plan to end foreign ownership requirements on electric vehicle makers this year.

This wouldn’t mark the first time authorities vowed to shed their protectionist shield. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China complained last year that foreign businesses were suffering from “promise fatigue.”

The problem is China’s high-tech ambitions include “plans to use instruments such as subsidized credit and market access restrictions,” said David Dollar, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former U.S. Treasury official in China. “It makes sense for the U.S. to oppose this practice.”

But Chinese officials see an irony in efforts that try to maintain America’s chokehold on innovation. Hua, the Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, likened the U.S. to a “bully only it can have high tech and others cannot.”

Neither side looks willing to bend. Recent talks to de-escalate the trade dispute reportedly collapsed over the 2025 plan.

“China views the overall system as inherently unfair because it was created by the current dominant power,” Trivium’s Polk said. “America should stop complaining and start designing its own industrial policy to counter China.”

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 09/09/18 •
Link to this articleLink to this article and comments
Home
 

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Next entry: Boom Bust

Previous entry: 45 Thousand Die Yearly from Lack Of Health Insurance

<< Back to main

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. - Martin Luther King Jr

Search


Advanced Search

Categories

Archives

Favorite Posts

Recent Entries

American Solidarity

Favorites

Statistics