Article 43

 

Wal-Mart and Staffing Agencies

The Wal-Mart Era…

I started my third temp job this week, almost a year after getting layed off from AT&T. I still lack a job with opportunity for growth, decent pay, and employer paid benefits. While my nest egg dissolves meeting bills the temp paycheck doesn’t, hopes of a happy future or happy retirement weaken each day.

AT&T is still laying off, and still REPLACING those layed off with low paid AMERICAN TEMPS, outsourced work to Communist China, poverty ridden India, and other suppliers of cheap labor.

I think Wal-Mart and companies like AT&T that PARTNER WITH STAFFING COMPANIES, are two solid indicators of America’s corporate, economic and political attitudes. 

They illustrate real world examples of the effects of today’s politics, unchecked corporatism, and corporate greed - striving for the lowest common denominator in search of increased profits with government support, who, in my opinion, are giving liittle reflection to the damge being inflicted on our society.

A blogger said Wal-Mart - the biggest employer in America today - tells it’s employees to get food stamps and public assistance, since they don’t get paid enough from their employer. Workers there lack adequate health benefits and make less than $10/hr.

Like American and multinational corporations, staffing agencies may be getting bigger, stronger, greedier, and less concerned on being good corporate citizens, following Wal-Mart’s model of employment and (lack of) benefits - while layed off middle class professional workers increase in numbers and desperation - resulting in widespread exploitation of the skilled labor pool for substandard wages, who may soon be cashing in food stamps too.

Other opportunities and the American Dream are DISAPPEARING.

Posted by Elvis on 06/09/05 •
Link to this articleLink to this article and comments
Home
 
  1. Here’s the CWA District 3’s June newsletter.
    It’s points are crystal clear.

    Our members in Locals 3176 and 3672 in the Sprint bargaining unit continue to work without a contract. Sprint has threatened to implement its last offer in the negotiations with Local 3176. This threat has not deterred the members of this Local from continuing their fight for a fair contract. Locals 3971, 3972 and 3974 in the Century Telephone bargaining unit in Alabama took another ratification vote and the tentative agreement that had previously been rejected was ratified.

    Our members in US Airways received a bit of good news this week. The bankruptcy court reduced the $55 million the company had proposed to set aside for management buyouts to $15 million. The court also rejected some “golden parachute” proposals for top executives for US Airways. The airlines continue to do these things even after our members have given up millions of dollars in wages and benefits to help keep the company in business.

    The National Labor Relations Board is currently mounting an attack against card check and neutrality when unions attempt to organize non-union companies. This practice has been in effect since the creation of the NLRA. The NLRB lead by the Bush administration is attempting to do away with this longstanding process. In 2004 the NLRB reversed 45 longstanding policies. All of these reversals favored corporations. The Secretary of Labor recently announced that she is reassigning 45 NLRB representatives from their current duties to do a re-writeof the Family Medical Leave Act.

    The current administration in Washington is also mounting an attack on guaranteed pensions. There is a concerted effort to move away from guaranteed annuities to having pensions funded solely by 401K type plans. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which was established to protect pensions when companies go out of business, is currently $100 billion under funded.

    Recent polls show that President Bush’s favorable ratings have dropped to 44%. Only 31% say he is doing a good job concerning Social Security. Even some of the top-ranking republicans are moving away from Bush’s plan to create private accounts. There is one way that Social Security could be fixed without changing the current formula. That would be to tax employees and employers based on total income. Currently Social Security taxes are only paid on the first $90,000 of income. If the caps were only raised to $140,000 this would go a long way in making Social Security viable well into this century. Listed below are examples of when CEO’s of the major employers where CWA holds contacts reach the $90,000 cap on Social Security.

    Seidenberg (Verizon) - January 2 - 3 p.m.
    Whitacre (SBC) - January 2 - 10 a.m.
    Ackerman (BellSouth) - January 2 - 5 p.m.
    Dorman (AT&T) - January 2 - 5 p.m.
    Notebaert (Qwest) - January 5 - 4 p.m.
    Immelt (GE) - January 3 - 1 p.m.
    Battenberg (Delphi) - January 7 - 9 a.m.
    Eisner (Disney) - January 3 - 3 p.m.

    We can begin to correct many of these inequities involved in the attacks on working families next year. We have elections in 2006 that could reverse the Republican majority in the House or the Senate. We have governors elections in several states within District 3 where we must work very hard to change the state House leadership. I look forward to working with all of you to make these things happen.

    Noah V. Savant
    Vice President

    Source:
    http://district3.cwa-union.org/viewArticle.asp?id=207

    Posted by Burned Out Baby Boomer  on  06/27/05
  2. Target Wal-Mart
    11/14/05

    Wal-Mart must feel like a pinata these days—everyone’s lining up to take a shot at it. This week, 7,000 house parties are being held to screen Robert Greenwald’s blockbuster documentary, “Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price.” The inspector general of the Labor Department censures its sweetheart deal that promised to give Wal-Mart notice before any future investigation of illegal child labor practices. Legislators from the L.A. City Council to the U.S. Senate are introducing legislation to curb the giant’s public subsidies. Communities are rejecting Wal-Mart’s demands for subsidies and zoning exemptions.  Right-wing groups are furious Wal-Mart is taking the Christ out of the Christmas holidays.  It’s gotten so bad that Wal-Mart has created a war room staffed by veterans of political campaigns to wage the PR battle.

    Why Wal-Mart? For one thing, it’s hard to avoid.  It is the world’s largest private corporation, employing more than 1.6 million “associates” worldwide—more people than Ford, GM, GE and IBM combined. The company serves 138 million customers per week worldwide and has outstripped any competitor. In 2004, it pocketed $10.3 billion in profits, on sales of $285 billion, more business than Target, Sears, Kmart, J.C. Penney, Safeway and Kroger combined. There are upward of 3,800 Wal-Mart stores in the United States today, in addition to nearly 1,600 locations in countries from Mexico to China.  Wal-Mart alone is China’s eighth-largest trading partner.  It accounts for over 10 percent of our annual trade deficit with China, with over 70 percent of its products made in China.

    If Wal-Mart’s size is a problem, its policies are a threat.  Wal-Mart is the model “low-road” corporation in the global economy. Its efficiency is celebrated; but its exploitation is caustic. The average pay of a Wal-Mart employee is $8.20 per hour, or an average yearly income of $15,000—not enough to lift a family out of poverty. Wal-Mart is infamous for requiring workers to work overtime off the books. It’s been cited for locking workers in plants overnight.  The company has been hauled into court for discriminating against female employees. And it is viciously, rabidly anti-union, crushing any attempt by its workers to organize to gain a fair share of the profits they help generate.

    But Wal-Mart doesn’t merely follow the low road; it drives its suppliers and its competitors into the same race.  When Wal-Mart comes to town, it purposefully wipes out small mom-and-pop stores, leaving small towns looking like they were hit by a neutron bomb—buildings intact, but people gone. Wal-Mart also undercuts big competitors that have unions and pay decent wages and benefits. They must slash wages, cut back on benefits or hang it up.

    Given its size in the United States, Wal-Mart is a major force in driving wages down and forcing cutbacks in benefits.  It is a central reason why we have an economy in which CEO salaries are up, stocks are up, but wages are down.

    In China, Wal-Mart pushes its suppliers to lower their costs, generating sweatshops in which young workers— primarily women—are forced to work grotesque hours at subsistence wages.  According to The Washington Post , Wal-Mart even pressures its suppliers to pay less than the Chinese minimum wage.

    Wal-Mart also exploits taxpayers, for it is what Ronald Reagan would denounce as the leading corporate welfare queen. It’s estimated that Wal-Mart’s government subsidies total a whopping $1.5 billion, or $2,100 per employee.  An internal memo to the board leaked recently reported that “our [health care] coverage is expensive for low-income families, and Wal-Mart has a significant percentage of associates and their children on public assistance.” In fact, nearly one-half of the children of Wal-Mart employees are either on Medicaid or have no insurance at all. 

    While Wal-Mart is driving down wages and driving up public health care costs, its CEO and its owners are making out like bandits. The Walton family is the richest in the world. And they use their private wealth to foster their low-road policies. The Waltons donate millions to politics. Most goes to Republicans who defend their low-wage sweatshop practices, and 20 percent goes to buy a few business Democrats to divide the opposition. They are leading contributors to the voucher movement seeking to privatize education, and staunch advocates of the free trade policies that have stymied efforts to link trade access to the right to organize, environmental protection or even a crackdown on sweatshops.

    Across America, people are starting to realize the stark reality: Wal-Mart’s triumph is the defeat of middle-class America. If Wal-Mart sets the pace, Americans will pay the price, in declining wages, rising health care costs, longer hours, worse conditions and rising personal taxes to offset soaring corporate subsidies.

    America as we know it can’t afford Wal-Mart.  We can’t sustain a $200 billion annual trade deficit with China, but Wal-Mart drives that deficit.  We can’t afford to subsidize the health care costs of the largest employers in the country—even as declining wages starve our public coffers.  We can’t afford to allow sweatshop labor access to the largest distribution network, without accelerating a global race to the bottom.

    In the Gilded Age of the 19th century, America faced a similar problem:  corporate behemoths, private fortunes amassed from exploiting workers, unions banned, politicians bought.  It took a progressive movement to put new rules around the marketplace—to break up monopolies, create the 40-hour work week, institute the minimum wage, the right to organize, environmental protection, and workplace health and safety laws.

    Now a new progressive movement is beginning to emerge.  Once more, its agenda is to ban sweatshops, lift wages, empower workers and curb corporate power.

    And surely Wal-Mart is and must be that movement’s first target. The question isn’t why Wal-Mart gets such bad press.  The question is why Wal-Mart hasn’t been confronted sooner. 

    SOURCE

    Posted by Burned Out Baby Boomer  on  11/14/05

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Next entry: Employee Vs Independent Contractor

Previous entry: GM cuts 25,000 US jobs

<< Back to main

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

Only a life lived for others is worth living - Albert Einstein

Search


Advanced Search

Categories

Archives

Favorite Posts

Recent Entries

American Solidarity

Favorites

Statistics