Article 43


Saturday, October 06, 2007

Going Postal


Layoff and a new chapter in life are looming near for myself and about 65 colleagues.

I’m grateful for having this job for over a year, having most of my NEEDS MET, and for bringing a little stability back to life, but afraid the NEXT JOB SEARCH may mean it’s time to THROW IN THE TOWEL and GIVE UP the house. Since this blog started over three years ago, the PREDICAMENT of middle-aged, MIDDLE-CLASS former telco techies like myself HASN’T CHANGED MUCH.

When I asked my boss why good people are GIVEN LAYOFF NOTICE, THEN ESCORTED OUT THE BUILDING without even being allowed to say good-bye to their co-workers and friends, he said it’s to protect the rest of us in case the person GOES POSTAL

That kind of treatment seems awfully cold and callous to me, and just another reminder that CORPORATIONS DON’T VALUE PEOPLE at all. But that assessment may not be entirely accurate.  My narrowminded thinking that WAY DOWN DEEP all people are good, may be clouded in DENIAL

A nomally nice guy at work explained that by his actions a couple of times in bursts of near rage when he screamed at people “You pissed me off” about some trivial job related thing, while his normally PAINTED-ON SMILE disappeared, revealing a side usually well hidden.

“Where did that come from?” I wondered to myself.

If escorting people out when they get layed off needs to be a CORPORATE POLICY, then it may not be such a bad idea after all - especially during THESE TIMES where an increasingly larger number of us are turned into corporate DOORMATS, with NOTHING TO SMILE ABOUT.

So, when I get my layoff notice, and the boss shows me to the door without being allowed to say farewell to anyone, I understand why it has to be this way.

KINDNESS and compassion DON’T RULE anymore.



Gut Feelings Drive Fairness Perceptions During Layoffs

July 2005

Workers who feel personally mistreated or underappreciated during a layoff but received a favorable outcome, such as a large severance package, are still more likely to view the layoff as unfair than those who feel well-treated, according to a recent study in APA’s Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 90, No. 3).

The study’s authors, graduate student Laurie J. Barclay and Daniel P. Skarlicki, PhD, of the University of British Columbia, and S. Douglas Pugh, PhD, of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, recruited 173 layoff victims from a Southern California outplacement center. Participants had worked in a range of industries and were laid off because of business restructuring--not poor job performance.

Participants completed a questionnaire that measured whether they felt their company handled the layoffs fairly, gave employees adequate explanation for the layoff, treated them with dignity or provided them with an ultimately favorable outcome, such as a decent severance.

Unlike previous studies on injustice perception in the workplace, Barclay says, the questionnaire also assessed participants’ emotions by asking them if they felt ashamed or angry about the layoff, believed the layoff was avoidable or tried to retaliate by, for example, spreading rumors about the boss.

Participants’ responses indicated they felt that the ends didn’t justify the means. That is, participants who felt disrespected or treated poorly during their layoff--for example, they didn’t receive adequate explanation for the layoff when they sought it--felt most angry toward their former employers, even if they received what they considered a fair outcome from the layoff, such as help finding a new job.

The findings run counter to previous research on injustice perception that found people are less likely to care about procedural injustice--for example, inconsistent office rules--when they feel the financial outcome is favorable to them. But that research largely ignored employee’s emotions, Barclay says.

The researchers believe a second type of injustice, interpersonal injustice, influences employees’ emotions and perceptions of fairness. The findings support this interpretation: A beneficial outcome resulting from the layoff still did not mitigate employees’ anger or negative perceptions of employers, the researchers say.

When people feel disrespected, it doesn’t matter what outcome you give them--they are still going to experience anger and hostility,” Barclay says.

The moral for managers? Even when participants deem final financial outcomes as fair, managers must ensure that employees also view as equitable both the procedures used to reach those decisions and interpersonal treatment the boss displays while making those decisions.

“It’s not enough to have fair procedures [to conduct a layoff] or fair treatment” of employees during it, Barclay explains. “Managers must pay attention to both types of fairness to avoid negative reactions.”



Posted by Elvis on 10/06/07 •
Section Dealing with Layoff • Section Personal
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Page 1 of 1 pages


Total page hits 9765329
Page rendered in 0.7678 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3222
Total Comments: 337
Most Recent Entry: 05/04/2020 08:41 am
Most Recent Comment on: 01/02/2016 09:13 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 18
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 172 on 12/25/2019 07:40 am

Email Us


Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck


Advanced Search



July 2020
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS Pages


All Posts



Creative Commons License

Support Bloggers' Rights