Article 43

 

Friday, January 25, 2008

Missing The Target

middle-class-squeeze.jpg

The Bush Tax Rebate Fails On Effectiveness And Fairness Criteria

By Jared Bernstein
Economic Policy Institute
January 23, 2008

Many policy makers and economists now agree that an economic stimulus package is needed to offset the slowdown in the U.S. economy. The Bush administration has floated a $145 billion plan, with $100 billion devoted to a tax rebate and the remainder earmarked for businesses. Final details have yet to be formally announced, but indications are that the president will propose a temporary elimination of the 10% federal income tax bracket. While such a rebate can help boost lagging demand by putting more money in consumers’ pockets, the White House plan suffers from very poor targeting, and thus fails on two critical criteria: efficiency and equity.

Over 70% of the rebate goes to the top 40% (income above $47,000) and less than 10% reaches the bottom 40% (income below $27,000). According the analysis by the Brookings-Urban Institute Tax Policy Center, 55.9 million households get no rebate at all from the plan, in part because many households pay no federal income tax. Most of these households, however, do pay other forms of taxes, such as payroll taxes on their earnings.

The economic research on effective stimulus is quite clear on this point: there is a greater bang-for-the-buck from rebates targeted at lower-income households than higher-income ones. As the Congressional Budget Office put it in a recent report:[PDF] “Lower-income households are more likely to be credit constrained and more likely to be among those with the highest propensity to spend. Therefore, policies aimed at lower-income households tend to have greater stimulative effects.” Given the well-documented increase in income inequality in recent years, excluding low-income households from the rebate also fails on the criterion of fairness.

For a tax rebate to be both more effective and more equitable, it should be targeted at low- and moderate-income households. One way to do this is to provide a rebate to all taxpayers, including those that have payroll tax liability, not just to those who pay federal income tax.

SOURCE

---

Statement by EPI President Lawrence Mishel

Economic Policy Institute
January 24, 2008

With news media reporting that the administration and Congress have reached agreement on an economic stimulus package, Economic Policy Institute President Lawrence Mishel issued a statement sharply critical of the contents of that deal.

The real test of any anti-recession plan is whether it helps working Americans to keep earning their paychecks and paying their bills.

This deal gets it half right by providing broad-based payments to individual workers and for children, with the administration backing off its ineffective, inequitable approach. It is scandalous, however, to throw about $50 billion at businesses for investments that have already been made. It is common sense and established economics that businesses invest and hire when they have customers, not when they get tax subsidies for equipment to make things they can’t sell.

Missing from the package is any effort to help the LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED or to help state governments avoid cutting public services [or PUBLIC PENSIONS ed.] and increasing taxes - actions that will only deepen the downturn. Moreover, we could create millions of jobs by rebuilding and repairing public schools, bridges, and highways.

At a time when unemployment is expected to increase to at least 6% by the end of the year, we don’t have a day or a dollar to waste. So far, the negotiations between the Democratic and Republican leaders have been a missed opportunity.

SOURCE

Posted by Elvis on 01/25/08 •
Section News
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Home
Page 1 of 1 pages

Statistics

Total page hits 9522566
Page rendered in 0.6140 seconds
40 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3206
Total Comments: 337
Most Recent Entry: 11/21/2019 10:21 am
Most Recent Comment on: 01/02/2016 09:13 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 11
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 114 on 10/26/2017 04:23 am


Email Us

Home

Members:
Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

The stoical scheme of supplying our wants by lopping off our desires, is like cutting off our feet when we want shoes. - Jonathan Swift

Search


Advanced Search

Sections

Calendar

December 2019
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS Pages

Favorites

All Posts

Archives

RSS


Creative Commons License


Support Bloggers' Rights