Article 43
Thursday, March 02, 2023
NWO Covid Year 3 Part 8 - What We Learned So Far
“We are currently experiencing what medical professionals have resorted to calling a PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED.” “We know vaccines are safe and effective. We know wearing masks in enclosed areas like schools, washing hands regularly, using sanitizer, and social distancing work. Even so, an alliance of idiots and evil profiteers seek to convince people otherwise.” Articles like THIS and THIS spread misinformation, ably backed up by enormously influential media outlets like FOX NEWS.
- Lyin BidenThe greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the United States government. Misinformation that covid was spread through surface transmission. That vaccinated immunity was far greater than natural immunity. That masks were effective. Now we have the definitive Cochrane review. What do you do with that review? Cochrane is the most authoritative evidence body in all of medicine, and has been for decades. Do you just ignore it not talk about it? That myocarditis was more common after the infection than the vaccine. Not true. It’s 4 to 28 times more common after the the vaccine. That young people benefit from a booster. Misinformation. Our two top experts on vaccines quit the FDA in protest over this particular issue - pushing boosters in young healthy people. The data was never there. That’s why the CDC never disclosed hospitalization rates among boosted Americans under age 50. The vaccine mandates would increase vaccination rates. The George Mason University study shows it didn’t. It did one thing. It created “never vaxxers” who are now not getting the childhood vaccines they need to get. Over and over again we’ve seen something that goes far beyond using your best judgment with the information at hand. We’ve seen something which is unforgivable and that is “the weaponization of medical research” itself. The CDC putting out their own shoddy studies like their own study on natural immunity. Looking at one state for two months when they had data for years on all 50 states. Why do they only report that one sliver of data? Why did they salami slice the giant database? Because it gave them the result they wanted. Same with masking study. Well the data has now caught up in giant systematic reviews, and the public health officials were intellectually dishonest they lied to the American people.
- Dr. Marty Makary speaking at the House Subcommittee on Coronavirus Pandemic Roundtable on Federal Response to COVID-19, February 28, 2023In addition to Florida’s analysis of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, academic researchers throughout our country and around the globe have seen troubling safety signals of adverse events surrounding this vaccine. Their concerns are corroborated by the substantial increase in VAERS reports from Florida, including life-threatening conditions. We have never seen this type of response following previous mass vaccination efforts pushed by the federal government. Even the HI NI vaccine did not trigger this sort of response. In Florida alone, we saw a 1,700% increase in reports after the release of the COVID-I9 vaccine, compared to an increase of 400% in vaccine administration for the same period. The reporting of life-threatening conditions increased 4,400%. This increase in adverse events, compared to the percent increase in vaccine use, further explains the significant uptick we are seeing in VAERS reports. These findings are unlikely to be related to changes in reporting given their magnitude, and more likely reflect a pattern of increased risk from mRNA COVlD-19 vaccines. We need unbiased research, as many in the Florida Department of Health.
- FDH Letter to NIH 2/15/2023The most obvious example of the fascist grift in the modern era is the mRNA COVID vaccines. ... The private, for-profit pharmaceutical industry has long abused the public coffers by bribing politicians through campaign donations, who in turn funnel taxpayer money into the subsidy of private “research and development” (called R&D in the industry). The COVID-19 pandemic greatly expanded the scope of public funding of the pharmaceutical industry’s projects.
- Pfizer’s Business Model is Actual Fascism - Covid Year 3, Part 7
---
What Can We Learn From The Biggest Lies People Believed About Covid?
By Brandon Smith
Alt-Market
February 10, 2023
At the very beginning of the covid event in late 2019 to early 2020 the public had little to no information on the details surrounding the outbreak in Wuhan, China and what kind of virus the world might be facing. The virus was coming to western shores and so the public had to prepare for the potential consequences.
People were supposedly dying en masse in China, but the communist country refused to give accurate data on the situation and to this day their reported covid death rate is highly suspect. After a period of uncertainty, suddenly, there was a rush by the media and by government officials to predict the worst case scenario. The WHO was calling for a SARS-like death rate of at least 3% or more That would mean a global tally of over 240 million+ fatalities.
For those of us in the Liberty Movement, this was seen as the “big one”; the kind of event that crashes economies and leads to an authoritarian society. It almost became that
From the very beginning certain narratives being promoted in the mainstream did not meet logical or scientific standards. It became obvious that fear was the goal, rather than safety. But in order to create fear, establishment elites and governments had to LIE BIG. Here are some of the biggest lies told to the public about the pandemic:
To this day there is no hard evidence that Covid-19 was gestated within the Wuhan wet market or that it was contracted by people eating bat soup. This lie was the reason I immediately began to suspect all information related to covid in the early days of the event.
Wuhan Wet Market Bat Soup Ground Zero?
In January of 2020 at the onset of the outbreak I published an article titled HOW VIRAL PANDEMIC BENEFITS THE GLOBALIST AGENDA. In that article I outlined evidence surrounding the Level 4 Biolabs in Wuhan, China and their specific work in SARS and coronaviruses. The labs are right down the street from the A wet market which was haphazardly labeled “ground zero.” Bizarrely, the mainstream media absolutely denied any validity for the Wuhan Lab theory and immediately began accusing anyone who mentioned it of conspiracy theory.
The Wuhan Lab should have been suspect #1, yet the MSM was busy blaming bat soup and social media companies were busy banning anyone that mentioned the claim. MOUNTING EVIDENCE continues to suggest that the virus came from the lab in Wuhan.
Why was this information ignored by the corporate media? It might be due to the American officials deeply involved in research at Wuhan. In 2020, evidence began to surface that Anthony Fauci, the lead figure handling the coronavirus response for the Trump Admin and later the Biden Admin had extensive ties to the Wuhan Lab. NIH DOCUMENTS PROVE that Fauci and his partners were involved in gain of function research on coronaviruses at Wuhan Fauci has consistently lied about these ties and his level of involvement.
It’s rather suspicious that the very same man who was using covid as an excuse to enforce sweeping restrictions that violated nearly every aspect of the US constitution was also the man that potentially funded the creation of the virus in the first place.
The Pandemic Was Unexpected?
I also pointed out in 2020 that a little over two months before the pandemic the WEF, Bill Gates and Johnson and Johnson held a simulationӔ of a viral pandemic called “Event 201.” The outbreak they were simulating? Coronavirus. What a coincidence.
The one thing that I believe was unexpected for the globalists, the thing that derailed a large part of their agenda, was the low Infection Fatality Rate of covid. The Event 201 simulation predicted a minimum of 60 million deaths from a coronavirus outbreak in the initial stages of the crisis. This obviously did not happen. They seemed to be operating on the assumption that many more people were going to die than actually did.
Covid Death Rate Of 3% Or More?
The manner in which the media, CDC and the WHO exaggerated the threat of covid cannot be forgiven. There was no evidence whatsoever to support the original claim that covids death rate would be 3% or more, and these organizations continued to lie about the threat covid presented long after numerous contrary studies were released.
As early as 2020, data showed that the median Infection Fatality Rate of the virus was a mere 0.23% (officially). Our government REFUSED to mention this number to the public and I do not think I have ever seen it mentioned in the media.
That’s right - The official survival rate for covid was always 99.8% or greater. Yet, people were led to believe that there would be bodies piled in the streets because no official agency and no mainstream journalists were willing to report on the real IFR. They wanted people to remain afraid.
Millions Died In The US From Covid
This may be one of the biggest lies of all. Scientists and doctors are now admitting what many of us knew for a long time That hospitals were declaring people dead from covid who had died by other causes. Studies now show that around 60%-70% of all covid deaths were “incidental,” meaning the patients had covid but died from a different cause, and they were marked as covid deaths anyway.
Does this mean that all doctors were in on a conspiracy? No, it just means that they were following systemic policies being implemented by the CDC. Even CNN’s top medical propagandist has admitted that COVID DEATHS HAVE BEEN OVERCOUNTED ... she just admitted it two years too late.
Masking Works?
MASKING makes no difference in the spread of covid. This should have been obvious from the fact that the states in the US with the strictest masking rules also had high rates of infection. However, while media outlets like the New Yorker were publishing articles making the case for MASK MANDATES FOREVER, an array of PEER REVIEWED STUDIES prove that masks are essentially useless against covid.
The debate is over, the science is in. The leftist mask cult can shut up now. They were wrong.
Masking And Social Distancing Outside Is Necessary?
One thing that I thought was utterly mind boggling was the implementation of mask mandates, distancing and lockdowns in outdoor places like beaches and parks. This defies everything we know about virology. UV light from the sun is a NATURAL DISINFECTANT and transmission of viruses in open air is incredibly low risk. Basically, it’s not going to happen.
I don’t think I saw a single doctor or scientist in the media bring up this fact, which has been known for decades. Some media outlets even lied about the effectiveness of sunlight in killing viruses like covid, arguing that the idea was false.
Why did governments and the media want people to believe that wearing masks outside was necessary? It makes no sense, unless you understand that it was not about science, it was about control. If you spent your days jogging, bike riding and walking in the park wearing a mask, you were well and truly duped.
Large Scale Lockdowns Work?
There is no evidence that lockdowns were effective it stopping the spread of covid. States with the harshest lockdowns also in many cases had the highest infection rates. Studies show that the effects of lockdowns on viral spread WERE NEGLIGIBLE. China, a nation with some of the most draconian lockdown policies in the world, has encountered multiple widespread covid outbreaks in the past couple years. Its time to take a hint’
Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated?
There was never a PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED, this was leftist media and White House hype. Breakout cases, meaning deaths of vaccinated people, have been present ever since the vaccines were introduced. In fact, studies now show that the vaccinated make up the MAJORITY OF COVID DEATHS.
The Vaccines Reduced Infection And Death Rates?
The Vaccines Reduced Infection And Death Rates?
There is no concrete evidence that the vaccines made any difference in the spread of the virus or in saving lives. The most aggressive infection and fatality rates from covid plunged in early 2021, MONTHS BEFORE THE VACCINES were widely distributed to the public. This suggests that the population was already developing herd immunity before the vaccines were introduced.
The majority of covid vaccine studies do not use the unvaccinated as a control group to show the effectiveness of mRNA products. So, vaccine efficacy is nothing more than a guess based on incomplete data. Studies outside of the pharmaceutical industry continue to show that NATURAL IMMUNITY IS FAR SUPERIOR to the vaccines.
Covid Causes Heart Failure?
This is a lie spread by the mainstream media through their “covid heart” narrative. There is no such thing as covid heart and studies prove THIS CLAIM TO BE FALSE.
What Can We Learn?
The hailstorm of lies surrounding the covid pandemic teach us a number of things We now know beyond a shadow of a doubt that future crisis events will be used as an excuse for the erasure of our freedoms. We have seen it first hand. The insidious measures we witnessed in western countries in response to people who refused to comply with mandates or vaccination on scientific and moral grounds showed us how precarious our civil stability truly is.
We learned, in the US at least, that conservative states were willing to stand up to the federal government and defy lockdown policies. This was after millions of people (mostly conservatives) put pressure on states to act, but we did prove that the public still has influence and that some states are willing to defend our rights.
To be fair, no one knew for sure what danger covid presented in the early days of the outbreak, but after it became clear it was a nothing burger, any political leader that continued to fear monger should be watched carefully.
Sadly, we also learned that there are millions of people who are willing to believe anything the government tells them as long as that government is aligned with their ideological biases. In America the majority of constitutional violations occurred in leftist controlled blue states and cities. Red states were mostly free, blue states were not. Red states abandoned mandates quickly while blue states tried to keep them permanently. This is just a cold hard fact.
By extension, while some people have expressed regret, it has become clear that a large number of leftists STILL refuse to admit they were wrong despite all the evidence that debunks their covid beliefs. In the end, for them, covid was about “winning” rather than being factually right.
The truth is, there is a sizable percentage of people who live vicariously through tyranny. They feed on scraps from the tables of authoritarians. These are the useful idiots we have long warned about in the liberty movement, and they were definitely on parade during covid, applauding the end of our country as we knew it and joyfully embracing Big Brother. When the next crisis erupts it’s not just the globalists we have to worry about, it is also the horde of leftist cultists and Karens anxious for another taste of power and willing to do anything to get it.
---
Energy Dept. leans toward lab leak as COVID origin, at odds with other agencies
“There is not a definitive answer that has emerged from the intelligence community.”
By Beth Mole
Ars Technica
February 27, 2023
The US Department of Energy has updated its previously undecided stance on the origin of the pandemic coronavirus, now saying with “low confidence” that it most likely emerged through a laboratory accident, according to a classified intelligence documentFIRST REPORTED BY THE WALL STREET JOURNAL on Sunday.
The change reignites a bitter, often partisan, debate over the elusive beginnings of SARS-CoV-2’s global devastation, a debate largely fueled by insufficient evidence on both sides.
Still, the Energy Department, which runs national laboratories, is in the minority. Of the eight elements of the intelligence community that have reviewed information on the origin of SARS-CoV-2, only two currently lean toward the so-called “lab leak” hypothesis. The other is the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which concluded with “moderate confidence: in 2021 that the pandemic was ignited by a lab leak, according to the WSJ. It’s unclear what evidence that assessment is based upon.
By contrast, four other intelligence agencies and the National Intelligence Council have assessed with “low confidence” that the pandemic was likely sparked by human exposure to infected animals, possibly via animals serving as an intermediate host between a natural reservoir for the virus (such as bats) before leaping to humans.
The two remaining intelligence agencies concluded that there was not sufficient data to coalesce around either the lab leak or spillover transmission hypotheses.
All of the intelligence elements agree that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon and that China officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before its emergence in Wuhan at the end of 2019.
Limited data
Many virologists and epidemiologists say a natural spillover transmission appears to be the most likely origin, noting epidemiological and genetic data pointing to this scenario- which has been the case for many other human outbreaks of viruses of animal origin, including those caused by other coronaviruses. In particular, two studies published last summer in the journal Science indicated TWO VIRAL LINEAGES OF SARS-CoV-2 SPILLED OVER INTO HUMANS IN TWO INDEPENDENT EVENTS, likely within days to weeks of each other, and most of the earliest cases centered at THE HUANAN SEAFOODF WHOLESALE MARKET IN WUHAN, particularly in a section of the market with a concentration of wild animals and virus-positive environmental samples. Collectively, the data and analyses suggest- though can’t definitively conclude - that the market contained a so-far unidentified animal or group of animals harboring SARS-CoV-2, which became a prolonged source of infection for marketgoers. And the virus took off from there.
Staunch proponents of the lab leak hypothesis, however, argue that the market was not the origin of the spillover but acted as a setting for superspreader events. They also often point to a 2021 intelligence report suggesting THREE RESEARCHERS FROM CHINA’S WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY GOT SICK with something and sought hospital care in November 2019, as well as AMBIGUOUS U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT CABLES FROM 2018 DISCUSSING BIOSAFETY ISSUES at a Wuhan virology lab.
There remains no confirmed evidence that a SARS-CoV-2 progenitor virus ever existed in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
“Not a definitive answer”
It’s unclear what swayed the Energy Department’s stance toward the lab leak hypothesis three years after the pandemic began, as fresh streams of evidence have largely dried up. The WSJ and The New York Times reported that the agency’s position was updated due to new intelligence drawn from its network of national labs, some of which are involved with biological research. But officials would not disclose what the intelligence is. A source for CNN noted that the Energy Department’s new classified report on the matter was SIMILAR to information from a House Republican Intelligence Committee report released last year.
National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan declined to confirm or deny the Energy Department’s reportedly updated stance on the coronavirus’s origins. In a Sunday interview on CNN’s State of the Union, Sullivan emphasized the lack of consensus.
“There is a variety of views in the intelligence community,” he said. “Some elements of the intelligence community have reached conclusions on one side, some on the other. A number of them have said they just don’t have enough information to be sure.” Sullivan noted that the Biden administration has pushed to find the truth of the matter.
“But right now, there is not a definitive answer that has emerged from the intelligence community on this question,” he said.
---
Health Alert on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety
Communications Office
Florida Department of Health
February 15, 2023
The COVID-19 pandemic brought many challenges that the health and medical field have never encountered. Although the initial response was led by a sense of urgency and crisis management, the State Surgeon General believes it is critical that as public health professionals, responses are adapted to the present to chart a future guided by data.
The State Surgeon General is notifying the health care sector and public of a substantial increase in Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports from Florida after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
In Florida alone, there was a 1,700% increase in VAERS reports after the release of the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to an increase of 400% in overall vaccine administration for the same time period.
The reporting of life-threatening conditions increased over 4,400%. This is a novel increase and was not seen during the 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign. There is a need for additional unbiased research to better understand the COVID-19 vaccines’ short- and long-term effects.
The findings in Florida are consistent with various studies that continue to uncover such risks. To further evaluate this, the Surgeon General WROTE A LETTER to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) illustrating the risk factors associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and emphasizing the need for additional transparency.
According to a STUDY, Fraiman J et al, Vaccine. 2022, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events, including coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries, Bells palsy, and encephalitis. This risk was 1 in 550 individuals, which is much higher than other vaccines.
A SECOND STUDY, Sun CLF et al, Sci Rep. 2022, found increased acute cardiac arrests and other acute cardiac events following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.
ADDITIONALLY, Dag Berild J et al, JAMA Netw Open. 2022, assessed the risk of thromboembolic and thrombocytopenic events related to COVID-19 vaccines and found preliminary evidence of increased risk of both coronary disease and cardiovascular disease.
While the CDC has identified safety signals for stroke among individuals 65 and older following the bivalent booster administration, there is a need for additional assessments and research regarding safety of all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
To support transparency, the State of Florida reminds health care providers to accurately communicate the risks and benefits of all clinical interventions to their patients, including those associated with the COVID-19 vaccine as additional risks continue to be identified and disclosed to the public.
The State of Florida remains dedicated to protecting communities from the risks of COVID-19 and other public health concerns, specifically by promoting the importance of treatment and promoting prevention through healthy habits. We encourage our health care partners and providers to do the same.
Section Revelations • Section NWO •
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one •
Printable view • Link to this article •
Home •
