Article 43


Sunday, November 17, 2013



The middle class must assert its worth to assure their share of America’s wealth

By Egberto Willies
Daily Kos
July 21, 2013

It is time for the MIDDLE CLASS to stop accepting CRUMBS for their labor and innovation. It is time for the middle class to demand, not ask, for programs that recover ill-gotten gains from a system that by design PENALISES WORK AND GLORIFIES CAPITAL.

Scientists research a subject or natural phenomenon in detail. Engineers use the body of work and research done by various scientists to come up with useful products for us all. Doctors in partnership with scientists and engineers effect the development of tools and medicines in order to provide a service, healing. Businesses employ citizens and sell products and services to citizens. Citizens deposit their savings in banks who lend it out to businesses at fair interest rates that allow the banker and staff a good wage and depositors a fair return on their deposits.

The above is a simplistic view of what free enterprise should look like. Purposely left out are two specific professions, teachers (from elementary school teachers to university professors) and the movers of capital (investment bankers, corporate raiders, etc.).

Without a doubt the most important profession in the world is in fact teaching. All the professions listed above were the result of teachers moving knowledge to the next generation. The movers of capital however can only be considered a parasitic venture.

The movers of capital have no interest in what a particular business does. The fact is that because the movers of capital are generally oblivious to science and subservient to the dictates of an assumed efficient capital market, their moves while making money for a few in the short term, generally HURT those it purports to help. The fact that the movers of capital would support businesses cutting employee hours in lieu of providing health care is probative.

The movers of capital lack of wisdom and foresight is EVIDENT. Forty years after the oil embargo there was no substantive investments in alternative energy even as countries like Brazil had. They’ve effected a business model heavy on outsourcing to maximize profits at the expense of wages falling locally along with an increase in unemployment. Lower wages and higher unemployment is tantamount to lower sales which spirals a country into contraction. This ultimately leads to an eventual and certain depression.

The indoctrination by a large percentage of our citizens into believing that only these movers of capital have the wherewithal to create jobs while government cannot is probably false. It is this false tenet that allows many to believe their unwarranted WORTH TO OUR SOCIETY. Small and large business people create jobs. They are worthy of their profits. Government “we the people” create jobs as well. After all teachers, police, firefighters, government scientists, engineers, and the like are all real jobs that add to our economy and societal value. A dollar spent whose genesis is the taxpayer receiving a needed service from the government is no different than a dollar spent whose genesis is a taxpayer receiving a needed product or service from a private company.

Sadly, for the movers of capital, it is imperative that the narrative of government not creating jobs metastasize in the American psyche. Only then can they keep unemployment high, wages low and profits obscene. Is it any wonder they dont wan’t massive infrastructure spending? Too many jobs created will cause wages to go up and profits to be fairer.

The movers of capital have a vested interest in maintaining their faҧade of worth to society. They must convince us that while the working man must pay up to 39.6 percent in Federal Income Taxes and up to 12.4 percent+ in Social Security Taxes that they should pay just a total of 20 percent (i.e., all pay 2.9 percent in Medicare taxes). They must convince our citizens that absent the outsourcing, trading, selling and bankrupting of companies for which they almost always profit immensely, that job creation for said action occurs in the aggregate. The state of the American economy should dispel this myth. Their goal is never patriotic or noble. It is always to maximize the capital appreciation for a very select few, a privilege the vast majority of Americans are not privy to.

The reality is the movers of capital have been a detriment to our society. They have used outsourcing and offshoring to keep unemployment high and depress American wages. They have purchased politicians to stop governmental job creation. They have usurped the religious ideologues to further pilfer the middle class. The sonogram laws that were passed in several states create a big market for sonograms. The decimation of funding for Planned Parenthood will not lower abortions but instead create a demand for higher cost private abortion clinics. State budget lower taxes decimate education budgets as they increase marginal after tax profits for corporations. Student forced to finance their education with high cost private loans further enhances the profits for the movers of capital. Implementation of Voter ID ensures that by the time citizens realize their government has pilfered them; the voter suppression laws make them fairly impotent to vote the culprits out.

Society has been programmed to deem these characters meritorious of the highest incomes and thus worth. Worth in America must be reclaimed. Worth must be consummate with what one produces for society that provides intrinsic value. This is not at all difficult to ascertain. Absent the teacher, education stalls. Absent the engineer bridges, buildings, and computers are nonexistent. Absent the doctors we are unhealed. Absent the scientists we do not have a body of knowledge. Absent the movers of capital, life goes on and the local banker who has a real interest in the community is reborn.

Americas indoctrination by a small class that provides no product or real service to the vast majority of our citizens must end. Americans must first visualize and externalize their real worth to society. They must let loose those shackles of indoctrination. The middle class must not accept the current wage or wealth paradigm. The middle class must assert its worth and force politicians to recover the nationҒs treasure and invest it in America and Americans, those that have done the work and innovation to make this country great.



How Ayn Rand’s Idiotic Worldview Makes the Wealthy Feel Good About Themselves
Sorry, but making a profit off something that’s useless to society is not morally superior to helping others.

By Sean McElwee
November 16, 2013

For those who havent had the great misfortune of reading “Atlas Shrugged,” the book is premised on the idea that if the world’s creative “leaders,” businessmen, innovators, artists (i.e., the “makers") went on strike, our entire society would collapse. These strikers hide out in a utopian compound in the mountains of Colorado while the rest of us despondently wail and gnash our teeth and beg for them to once again bestow their creativity upon us.

The book mirrors in many ways the more lefty “Elysium,” where to escape the environmental degradation they have wrought, the wealthiest go off to form their own society in the sky. The rest of the human population remains mired in slum-like conditions, because the only thing standing between humanity and savagery is Bill Gates. But have no fear! Rather than collectively solving our problems, humanity needs a salvific “Jesus” in the form of (who else?) Matt Damon to make us citizens of Elysium and thereby save humanity. These two, very disparate tales of woe both have common elements (what I will call the Randian vision): society relies on the wealthy; collective action through government is either meaningless or detrimental; and a few individuals (great men) should be the center of social change and innovation. But all of these assumptions are false.

The appeal of the Randian vision to todays wealthy is obvious: it puts them back at the center of economic life. They long ago realized that rather than being the beneficent “makers” they had always imagined themselves to be, they were the parasitical “takers” they so despised. Their wealth, which was once a symbol that God praised their work, became an instrument for social change (Carnegie, Rockefeller) and eventually good in itself (Gates, Jobs). Social Darwinism, the idea that the economy is a “survival of the fittest” competition where the superior end up on top, exults the businessman as superior and deserving. But as Henry George noted of Herbert Spencer (the founder of Social Darwinism): “Mr. Spencer is like one who might insist that each should swim for himself in crossing a river, ignoring the fact that some had been artificially provided with corks and other artificially loaded with lead.” F. Scott Fitzgerald and Thorstein Veblen ridiculed the idea that the wealthy were in any way superior. Social Darwinism has resurged in conservative thought, supplementing the Randian vision to fortify a social order in which a minuscule proportion of society reaps its rewards.

Because the wealthy are no longer willing to use their wealth for good, they have decided to glorify the wealth itself as good, thus, Harry Bingswanger WRITES IN FORBES:

Imagine the effect on our culture, particularly on the young, if the kind of fame and adulation bathing Lady Gaga attached to the more notable achievements of say, Warren Buffett. Or if the moral praise showered on Mother Teresa went to someone like Lloyd Blankfein, who, in guiding Goldman Sachs toward billions in profits, has done infinitely more for mankind. (Since profit is the market value of the product minus the market value of factors used, profit represents the value created.)

Here we see the Randian vision in all its idiotic glory. If you could make a profit by pressing puppies into coffee, you deserve more moral praise than someone who dedicates their life to the poor. As E.F. Schumacher observed about capitalism, Call a thing immoral or ugly, soul-destroying or a degradation to man, a peril to the peace of the world or to the well-being of future generations: as long as you have not shown it to be uneconomic [unprofitable] you have not really questioned its right to exist, grow, and prosper. To justify their wealth, the titans of industry must make themselves the center of economic progress and society, but the dirty little secret is that they arentt; theyre just along for the ride. As Richard Hofstadter observed about American capitalism, “Once great men created fortunes; today a great system creates fortunate men.”

This observation fits with the facts: William Baumol found in the 1960s that 90 percent of the United States GDP today is due to innovations since 1870. Nobel Prize winner Herbert Simon estimates that a flat tax of 90% of income is justifiable because “social capital” accounts for 90% of income in developed countries. The Human Genome Project cost the government $3.8 billion but generated $796 billion in economic gains. The project is expected to bring about returns of 140 to 1 to the public. Research by Kenneth Flam finds that, eighteen of the twenty five most important breakthroughs in computer technology between 1950 and 1962 were funded by the government, and in many cases the first buyer of the technology was also “the government.” The Randian vision praises hedge fund managers, even though most hedge funds underperform the market. Social Darwinism praises the CEO even though the most highly-paid CEOs are often unsuccessful and many companies run fine without them. Society praises Zuckerberg, Brin and Dorsey, but it was DARPA that made their coding possible. Much of the research the government pursues isnt profitable enough to merit the attention of private companies, or is simply too risky. Private space flight is only imaginable because the government went there first.

It seems almost axiomatic that no good person has ever done something great merely for a profit. They seek something more important than material possession. So why should we fear if the wealthiest left us? I would fear for the world if the empathetic, the intelligent, the compassionate, the fearless and the creative left us. We don’t celebrate these virtues unless they somehow lead to monetary gain, but often they don’t. Norman Borlaug, father of the “Green Revolution” that BY SOME ESTIMATES saved 1 billion people from starvation and who WAS HAILED AS a towering scientist whose work rivals that of the 20th century’s other great scientific benefactors of humankind, didn’t work for money; he worked to help people. A DALLAS OBSERVER STORY about him noted that he, rarely indulged in the comforts of the industrialized West for any extended period of time. His choice has been to immerse himself in locales where people stare death in the face every day. When a reporter saw Mother Teresa helping a disfigured leper, he said to her, “I wouldn’t do that for a million dollars.” Mother Theresa said, “Neither would I.”

The Walton family heirs, whose fortune relies entirely on predation - of labor, of the environment, of government, of small business - controls more wealth than the POOREST 40 MILLION AMERICANS Imagine what we could do with that fortune if they left. For all the credit Bill Gates gets, it may be worth wondering, AS PETER SINGER DID, if he has given enough:

Gates may have given away nearly $30 billion, but that still leaves him sitting at the top of the Forbes list of the richest Americans, with $53 billion. His 66,000-square-foot high-tech lakeside estate near Seattle is reportedly worth more than $100 million. Property taxes are about $1 million. Among his possessions is the Leicester Codex, the only handwritten book by Leonardo da Vinci still in private hands, for which he paid $30.8 million in 1994. Has Bill Gates done enough? More pointedly, you might ask: if he really believes that all lives have equal value, what is he doing living in such an expensive house and owning a Leonardo Codex? Are there no more lives that could be saved by living more modestly and adding the money thus saved to the amount he has already given?

If Gates donated all $53 billion to foreign humanitarian aid, it would be double what the U.S. government gives yearly ($23 billion in 2013). Imagine the good we could do with the fortunes of the rich, who have only amassed the wealth because of the infrastructure developed by society. Innovators regularly rely on government and academic funding for projects that corporations donגt think will be profitable (according to Singer, less than 10 percent of the world’s health research budget is spent on combating conditions that account for 90 percent of the global burden of disease). The arts are largely supported by public funding, not private donations. And many businesses are less self-sufficient than they imagine, requiring bailouts and competition between states to support them. Many corporations, like Walmart, dump poor employees on to government largess rather than pay them enough to feed themselves. And who builds the roads and takes out the garbage?

Were the richest .01% to venture out and form their own society, the rest of us would not devolve into violent conflict; rather, without the expensive burden of the wealthy tapeworms siphoning our common wealth, we could begin to solve our problems. So to the rich who threaten to leave New York, I say, “go.” If the rich somehow manage to form their own planet, we can start fixing the problems on ours. We are the makers, they are the takers.

Sean McElwee is a writer for The Moderate Voice and blogs at HERE. He has previously written for The Day and The Norwich Bulletin and on WASHINGTON MONTHLY and REASON.  He blogs at Follow him on Twitter @seanmcelwee.


Posted by Elvis on 11/17/13 •
Section Revelations • Section Dying America
View (0) comment(s) or add a new one
Printable viewLink to this article
Page 1 of 1 pages


Total page hits 10837352
Page rendered in 0.7544 seconds
43 queries executed
Debug mode is off
Total Entries: 3359
Total Comments: 339
Most Recent Entry: 10/14/2021 11:24 am
Most Recent Comment on: 09/26/2021 05:03 pm
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 4
Total anonymous users: 0
The most visitors ever was 172 on 12/25/2019 07:40 am

Email Us


Login | Register
Resumes | Members

In memory of the layed off workers of AT&T

Today's Diversion

Healthy pleasure brings satisfaction; addictive pleasure brings a craving for more. - Judith Anodea


Advanced Search



October 2021
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Must Read

Most recent entries

RSS Feeds

Today's News

ARS Technica

External Links

Elvis Picks

BLS and FRED Pages


All Posts



Creative Commons License

Support Bloggers' Rights